Home Blog Page 53

The NHS has a Diversity Problem which needs attention

The NHS should be diverse to reflect the plethora of people in British Society; a lack of diversity is appalling and with such a rich talent pool, there is no excuse.

Image result for NHS BME

Many BME staff, and their parents before them have seemingly spent a lifetime working in the NHS, despite this, currently, there is less than 7% BME representation at the most senior levels in our National Health Service. It is a generational legacy by professionals, but also a generational inheritance of prejudice, unconscious bias and institutional racism.

In response to an article published in The Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jul/24/windrush-nursing-top-jobs-programme-bme-nurses

Via the Windrush generation, African Caribbean nurses arrived in their droves to Britain, alongside other unskilled and skilled workers with the arrival of HMS Windrush and other shops in July 1948. They have since been major contributors to the NHS since its very beginning.

The arrival of these migrants kept the NHS afloat, bolstered the workforce, due to human capital depletion from the war, Britain simply did not have the manpower to run the service. Despite this, they arrived and were met with hostility because framing by the media then was similar to today; beware of the immigrants coming to take your jobs.

“No cats, no dogs no Irish”.

Image result for no dogs no irish

Britain on the surface appears to be a nation of diversity, with 15% of the population from BME backgrounds and this figure continues to grow, to the dismay of some. The NHS is the biggest employer of people from a BME background in Europe; with one-in-five of the workforce are from a BME background. Over 40% of hospital doctors are from a BME background and 25% of nurses and midwives. In areas like London, most organizations have more than 35% of people from BME backgrounds working in them. Yet, BME in top levels are somewhat still an intangible dream.

Racism and unconscious bias are hardwired into human existence.

Scientists believe that stereotypes, serve a purpose. By clustering people into groups with expected traits allow us to navigate the world without being overwhelmed by information. The downside is that the potential for prejudice is hard-wired into human cognition. The NHS and many organisations alongside this illustrate this stereotype and unconscious bias.

I remember the story my mother told me of the hostile, unforgiving and racist environment in 1972 after the Windrush generation. My mother went on to be a registered nurse and the head of the ward.

My mother once told me patients, visitors and staff from other departments would walk past her and ask her white colleagues for the nurse in charge of the ward. My mother’s colleagues would point back at my mother to let them know they walked back the nurse in charge. Typically it was to the utter dismay on their faces, yet she was wearing the colours designated to signal she was the nurse in charge of the ward. The stereotype, a black person woman couldn’t be in charge. And perhaps a sense of cognitive dissonance.

However, the world is changing and we are in an age where we overwhelmed with information in the racial context, we can do some unpacking. 70 year is time to long. The course of the NHS is heading down is a slippery slope, but with a more diverse NHS, things might change.

Its a work in Progress

In 2015 the Workforce Race Equality Standard (WRES) was introduced into the NHS celebrating the contribution of these unsung members of staff.

Recognising these contributions over the last 70 years, the NHS70 Windrush Awards were created with 11 categories. These categories celebrate the breadth and depth of diversity in the NHS.

Awards categories include:

  • Clinical excellence for medics 
  • Clinical excellence for nursing
  • Operational service excellence
  • Clinical excellence for allied health professionals
  • Contribution towards improving health inequalities 
  • Research & policy development 
  • Unsung hero
  • Rising stars innovation
  • BME inspirational leader
  • NHS lifetime achievement award 
  • Top leadership

However, whilst the NHS70 awards are great, they are simply a band-aid on a deep wound that has bled for 70 years. Diversity hasn’t been the one that bled into the NHS. There needs to be something more.

The beginning of a solution: The Burdett BME Nurse Development Programme

After Catherine Gamble, head of nursing education, practice and research at South West London and St George’s NHS trust (SWLSTG), Gamble won the grant of £176,000 to create a separate leadership and professional development programme for BME staff.

Offering six full-day sessions over six months, championed by people from minority ethnic backgrounds and focus groups with staff to find out what they needed.

According to the article “All this had an impact on the first cohort. Within six months, half of the attendees showed a desire to progress in their careers by applying for new roles. All 18 people who submitted applications were shortlisted, and 14 of them were successful.

The programme comprised of games based on exploring management theory and exercises. Participants are encouraged to think about themselves and what they bring to their job. Alongside one-to-one coaching and must come up with a project they can implement in their jobs. This is essential for BME to build resolve and ambition to enter the senior roles.”

This programme is important as it allows for BME to receive top-level development whilst building confidence. Positions should not be guarded based on race, or ethnicity. Talent is talent. Skill is a skill and BME staff should be granted these chances and opportunities granted they have the skills. It is effective and with a focus on BME what could possibly happen next?

Unconscious bias training will be needed alongside these programmes to promote BME staff into top roles. The world around them has to also change to eradicate the negative perceptions from the media, and education especially and advertising to help reflect the society more.

Football Fan Groups Gaining Power: Arsenal Make Moves

0

In this transfer window one team has emerged as front runners for having the best summer yet. With players that boost their starting XI and set new foundations, it seems that Arsenal are on the come up to position themselves to start winning trophies again.

Arsenals transfer targets until recent years have been very lacking and their transfer strategies even more so. Through years of linked players that included Suarez with the comical offer to Liverpool of £40 million and £1. Since the post Wenger era, Unai Emery has been slowly building a team that can play to his style of football; maybe not totally exciting but it gets them through the season. The only problem is Arsenal’s heavily restricted transfer budget.


Tides are turning

Arsenals transfer budget of this summer? £45 million. They had aimed to buy former Manchester United and now Crystal Palace’s, Wilfred Zaha for around £40 million and pay that in instalments which made them the laughing stock of the footballing world for a few days. To the embarrassment of Arsenal fans this might have been the straw that broke the camels back. But Arsenal fans did not stay quiet on this occasion, they struck back hard.

After an open letter by the fans to the owner of the team last month, things indeed started to take a turn. The letter made mention of Kroenke being ‘passive’ and ‘absent’ in the club. Adding ‘Watching in frustration as the teams performances have declined over the past decade’ accusing Kroenke of buying Arsenal Football club as an ‘investment vehicle’.

The collective of Arsenal fans reminded Kroenke that when he bought the club they were in the Champions league final but now at this conjecture they are treading with 3 Europa league campaigns in a row.


Cue new players

Arsenal have managed to make 4 signings/loans this summer. Gabrielle Martinelli, Daniel Ceballos, William Saliba and a club record signing in Nicolas Pepe (£72 million). These are very good signings for Arsenal, especially at the level that they’re currently playing. Being able to elevate their quality is critical.

Nicolas Pepe at Lille. Source: Goal

The stand out marque signing has to be Nicolas Pepe. A man who was linked with United, is a fantastic talent and a great winger scoring 35 goals in 74 appearances for Lille. The 24 year old Ivorian deserves all the attention that’s been coming to him. With his ability and directness for the net, having the option of Lacazette and Aubameyang in front as well will make any team concerned.

William Saliba, the centre back is another French player, aged only 18 years old coming from AS Saint Etienne. His announcement for Arsenal caused a lot of excitement as the video he released on his Instagram were likened to that of Pogba’s announcement when he returned back to Manchester United. With big expectations at such a young age, fans will hope he can perform.

https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/arsenal/arsenal-analysis-dani-ceballos-makes-first-impression-as-joe-willock-delivers-firstteam-statement-a4199906.html


Daniel Ceballos is a 23 year old Spanish midfielder who Arsenal managed to get on loan from Real Madrid, he also plays for the Spain National team. The caveat to his deal is that it was reported Ceballos requested to not put in an option for Arsenal to buy him. It seems that he might be using this opportunity to really make a name for himself again to get himself back into one of the worlds best teams in Madrid. Moreover his highlight reel is impressive to say the least.

Ceballos and Saliba were both signed on the exact same day.

Who has the power?

Going from struggling to meet the asking price for Wilfried Zaha to breaking the club signing record, one can’t help but ask just how effective that fan letter was. With one of Arsenal’s biggest fan groups, Arsenal Fan TV, having over one million subscribers on YouTube, that’s a strong following that the Arsenal board can’t afford to ignore.

Social media and the internet have given football fan groups more power than they would have had 20 years ago. Talks of boycotting merchandise and games is bad news for a profitable club like Arsenal FC.

But could all of these new signings be a clear indicator of current Arsenal players being shipped out? Perhaps the fan pressure means absolutely nothing and the board are still running the show how they please amidst the tensions.

Whether the board were already setting things in motion with transfers before fan pressure will be something to be decided as the transfer window draws close. It’s fair to say Arsenal fans are a lot happier in this transfer window than seasons past. The feeling of being ‘marginalised, less listened to or valued’ will surely but slowly be fading away. Unless this was just a ploy to keep the fans at bay.

Self-defence or protest? Clothing and sexualisation

One would think that with the constantly evolving intelligence regarding sexuality in the world, sexual harassment wouldn’t still be a grave issue. But to this day, we have consistently seen how many women are tormented in the streets, online and in public spaces. When the current President of the United States has over 20 separate allegations of various sexual misconduct met with muted media response, it’s obvious we have a way to go.

Many women do things in an attempt to curb the behaviour whether that be to comment back to the hecklers on the road, ignore the remarks and some go as far as to dress in a way which they believe will draw the least attention from the male gaze.

Women dismissing male harasser on the street (Source: MoroccanLadies.com)

This is the case for Billie Eilish, an American singer, song-writer and model who gained her large following from her debut single “Ocean Eyes” and a range of other songs which evoke dark and deep lyrics mixed with catchy beats which climb the charts.

Eilish fans will be very familiar with modest-type style which incorporates super baggy clothing in order to conceal her body shape and often large areas of her skin. It’s cool, urban and specially designed to draw attention to loud patterns not her body.

At a campaign ad for Calvin Klein she explained that she did this so that people cannot judge her body, stating that “Nobody can have an opinion because they haven’t seen what’s underneath”. At the young age of seventeen, she understands the ways she can be easily sexualised and objectified by the public if she decided to put her body on even the slightest amount of display.

The very fact that she has had to openly state this, shows how priorities in our misogynistic culture remain skewed. A seventeen year old girl that has achieved global fame for her talent without really showing an inch of skin has still been under the spotlight because of some clothing choices.

The Sexualisation of Billie Eilish

After being photographed wearing a tight tank top a Twitter troll went on to denigrate her by publicly commenting on her body.

Fans defended her calling out the despicable and objectifying comment made on a girl who in most of the United States would be regarded as a minor. Despite the large effort she has gone through to not be sexualised people still felt entitled to judge and ogle at her physique.

Singer Song-writer Billie Eilish (Source: TeenVougue)

She’s definitely not the only one for it to happen to and she will not be the last.

So what does clothing do exactly?

Clothing is not only to cover up but also used as a form of expression. If one should express themselves in the way they want to, does Billie Eilish’s stand on wearing baggy clothes to not draw attention, criminalise those who choose to show more skin? Should we have to conceal and change the way we dress in order to avoid being viewed as an object? Or on the other hand does it just confirm in black and white that the only way to avoid sexual degradation is to cover up?

Can clothing even do much? In many conservative countries, despite covering up, women still face sexual harassment. A growing issue of example is the mass sexual harassment problems currently going on in Egypt.

In a 2019 documentary by the channel Unreported World, women talked about how whether they wore a headscarf, niqab or even nothing over their hair they’d still be harassed or even chased by men.

Egyptian women at a demonstration (Source: EgyptToday)

In addition to this, according to a survey by the Egyptian Centre for Women’s Rights in 2008, 83% of women claimed to have experienced harassment as well as 98% of expatriates. Another study made in 2013 by the UN found 99% of women respondents had been sexually harassed. With a very heavily traditional and religious country comes a lot of modest dressing. But despite this they also cannot seem to shake off the male gaze.

So what can we do about this?

Like most things it takes education and a relook at this shaming culture that every culture in the world is involved with. What one wears, at the end of the day, shouldn’t determine whether they are assaulted or heckled at. Female bodies are often sexualised for merely existing in the world, and our hungry tabloid media promotes the consumption and judgement of celebrity skin for entertainment. Lets not pit women against each other in a divide and rule strategy but rather empower our own and others choices. Our clothing, however it looks, can be a strategy of self-defence but also beautiful protest. Through understanding how to respect women as equals and being mindful of the media we consume we can approach a post sexual-harassment society.

Johnson’s Round Table

Following Boris Johnson’s appointment as Prime Minster last week, where he gave a (somewhat moving in the moment) speech to inspire and motivate the country, he pledged to raise police numbers to 20 million in the coming years. Johnson’s pledge seems contradictory to his party’s history, with police numbers dropping significantly during the Conservative Government. As well as increase police numbers, Johnson wants to improve education by increasing per-pupil funding within primary and secondary school. While it’s admirable that Johnson plans to focus on mitigating the discourses within our society, the question which remains, is if he can get it done ahead of the Brexit challenge.

Logically speaking without guaranteeing a formula for the UK’s exit from the EU makes it a challenge, whether these promises from Boris are genuine or just lip service. Promises which go down memory lane, such as increasing funding to Northern cities such as Manchester and Leeds with “improved rail line”.

Having been echoed in the past northerners must be tired of MPmaking promises they can’t pull through with. Boris Johnson even asking the mute crowd for a half-hearted applause to his “amazing” announcement highlights the distrust.

https://twitter.com/moalmail/status/1155477883378393088?s=20
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/boris-johnson-promises-new-high-speed-rail-links-to-connect-the-north/

 The Cabinet

Boris Johnson in his first meeting, alongside his newly appointed cabinet members.
Credit: Evening Standard

Boris Johnson made a rather large reshuffle within his cabinet following his appointment. Which has been regarded as worse as the “Night of the Long Knives” in 1962 under Prime Minister Harold Macmillan. Mr Johnson sacked and replaced 19 seats within the cabinet. With the formation of a cabinet that is very pro-Brexit, the new cabinet signifies Boris’ desire to have a cabinet that is willing to follow his vision.

“Night of the Long Knives” Hinted with Mr Johnson’s huge cabinet reshuffle
Credit: The Express

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-cabinet-resignations-mordaunt-fox-clark-grayling-a9019341.html

Priti Patel

Priti Patel-Current Home Secretary

With the makeup of Boris cabinet, it’s interesting to see certain players in the senior positions that they’ve attained. One being Priti Patel who is now the Home Secretary, following her dismal in 2017 as Secretary of State for International Development. This was due to her having unauthorised meetings with the Israeli government. Now back as Home Secretary, Mrs Patel plans to reform immigration policy, which may be radical. Hinting that with or without a deal for Brexit this radical reform will take place within immigration policy.

With policy being like that of Australia’s point-based system. Where to be granted admission to the country a threshold must be met in terms of points, from categories around experience, language capabilities, wealth, etc. A system such as this will appeal to attracting the best and brightest minds to the UK. But with the anti-globalisation message signalled to the world with the approach to Brexit, this strategy from Mrs Patel may fall on deaf ears.

Dominic Raab

Dominic Raab- Current Foreign Secretary

Another significant figure within Boris’ cabinet is Dominic Raab our new Foreign Secretary which unseated the former Jeremy Hunt after his resignation. Strange for Dominic Raab to take up the position as Foreign Secretary, having previously been the Brexit Secretary under May’s cabinet. But with his resignation as Brexit Secretary after agreeing to a deal he consigned under May’s government, is a mystery.  Now as foreign secretary a role that must be done with care and diligence which the PM failed to do previously now rests on Mr Raab’s shoulders.

Within a week, he has already been seen as controversial due to his views on a no-deal Brexit. He believes that a no-deal Brexit would make it easier to negotiate terms with the EU later. Which in this moment seems laughable, as if we can not negotiate terms now, how would it be possible for terms to be negotiated later? If Mr Raab believes that post-no-deal Brexit UK will be able to trade easily with the EU or sort out the Northern Ireland backstop, by frank he must be delusional.

With Mr Raab realising how pivotal Dover-Calais trade relations are, it creates the question, does he have a clue on what’s is going on. Having previously stated during the run-up to the vote that a no-deal Brexit would be catastrophic for Britain.

Dominic Raab caught out on his hypocrisy regarding a no-deal Brexit in 2016

Sajid Javid

Sajid David- The Rt Honourable Gentlemen; Chancellor of the Exchequer

Surprisingly, Sajid Javid who was previous Home Secretary has now become the second most powerful man in Britain, bagging the top job as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Having lost in the leadership contest in fourth-place. Even though previously being a Remainer but now a Eurosceptic, has an enormous challenge ahead of him. Preparing an emergency budget in the event of a no-deal Brexit. Funding the resources for the Prime Minister’s social reforms in public policy. As well as preparing the UK for the many years ahead with a positive economic outlook.

Having previously been at Deutsche Bank and making £3 million-a-year on his credentials. As well as standing back while UK Port Talbot went under as Business Secretary in 2016. And going on holiday whilst Tory MPs revolted over business rates. Praise for the Chancellor who is the first ethnic minority to hold this position. Time will tell if the policies that Sajid Javid implements will bring prosperity post-Brexit or calamity.

“The most diverse cabinet we’ve ever had?”

With the make of this cabinet screaming elitism, with majority 15 coming from Oxbridge and four from Eton. This doesn’t represent or echo a cabinet which represents a growing and diversified Britain. Yes, the appointment of Priti Patel and Sajid Javid is a step in the right direction and hopes that within years more people of BAME backgrounds get into senior positions within Parliament.  Fears for me is that people will continue to suffer at the hands of a cabinet that is drastically different from much of the UK population. Not everyone has been to Oxbridge, Eton or a wealthy family to sponsor them through their career. The claim that this cabinet is the most diverse we’ve seen is laughable and in fact insulting.

The Black Misogynistic Empire strikes back

In just two tweets, the internet was set alight, by comments from Irish rapper duo Versatile and American rapper Lil Duval,

Both comments highlighted their disregard and contempt towards black women.

The Irish rap duo is comprised of Versatile, Alex Sheehan, 21, and Casey Walsh, 20, perform as inner-city rappers ‘Casper’ and ‘Eskimo Supreme.’, and are otherwise known as Versatile.

Versatile proclaimed in song lyrics ” “I f**k black bitches when my fat b***h is at home in the kitchen. All my side b****es are dark-skinned and kissing & licking my d**k they prefer it to chicken.”

Image result for outburst pal rapper

Famous Irish Writer, Historian Emma Dabiri took to Instagram to highlight her anger at the artists and where Irish rap seems to be headed.

Twitter user @Bazzaaa_ji said “Isn’t all rap like this? Isn’t it all deplorable when it uses language like this? Or is ok only if black rappers use it?”.

It is true, some aspects of rap are sexist and highly deplorable. However, culturally appropriating the words of a specific form of cultural expression is not OK because the original does it. The original needs to change otherwise the black community lends a licence to others to use it.

Words are owned by no one.

Big Curly Bushy Hair Look

Rapper lil duval whose real name is Roland Powell, posted on his twitter account saying “I hate the big curly bushy hair look. I’m not saying stop wearing it ladies i personally just don’t like it. I like every other style tho especially the straight hair look. But that big Afro lion shit no can do.”

Image result for lil duval
American Rapper Lil Duval (Roland Powell)

Whether in America or Ireland, the problems remain the same. Misogyny is rampant and widely common for black women particularly.


Twitter user @Noon Quill ” People constantly use Eurocentric beauty standards to try to make Black women feel unpretty. We love ourselves despite them. His “opinion” propagates the idea that Black women can only be beautiful if they adhere to Eurocentric beauty. I hope he doesn’t have kids, esp daughters.”

Preference is human. Preference is what makes the world diverse, but in a time where black women are embracing their natural beauty, we must do what we can to support this growth and generally that positive trend that seems here to stay.

The internet can be and is the wild west where the truth emerges from the misogynistic depths from which it was bred. Each comment from both rappers is an imminent, verbal and explicit truth of where rap continues to be and where it may forever stay.

Lil Duval alongside Versatile illustrates the lack of love for black women, only in terms of their sexual qualities, woven in with stereotypes of chicken and that “big bush curly look”. Whilst Lil Duval highlights the denigration for the hair that grows a black woman’s head in the form of the afro. The only thing that defies gravity. He is entitled to his preference however to speak of it in such negative terms does nothing to the endearment black women deserve, need and should receive from their own black men.

Misogyny, racism and murder continue to sell in rap. A category under fierce scrutiny, on both sides of the colour line, it’s not acceptable black or white from Versatile. The black community can not stand for this, but we must call out our own black artists who continue to support this.

Not only are those who purchase black artists who rap about this are enablers of such lyrics, we unwittingly set a precedent on how we want the rest of the world to, therefore to see us.

Is Boris’ Emergency Budget Steering Us Into A Straight No-Deal Brexit?

Since Boris’ appointment as Prime Minister last week. He has made it clear what his plan was; to take the UK out of the EU, come Halloween. In fact, since the selection of his pro-Brexit cabinet, the Prime Minister has demanded preparations to deal with the possible blowbacks of a no-deal Brexit. Because of this, the new Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid has made an available £1.1bn immediate cash boost; alongside a further £1bn if necessary.

In short, an emergency budget set aside of £2.1bn to turbocharge the economy after we leave the EU. If we take into consideration the total allocation of spending this year alone, that would be up to £6.3bn, quite surreal for a conservative government who have always kept a tight purse on public expenditure. The areas of the money set aside in this emergency funding ranges from border operations, extra officers, continuity of medicines and much more.

This approach from the conservative government is to ensure that the country is prepared for a no-deal Brexit. It also could be seen as a way of helping the UK negotiate with Brussels to get a deal which benefits both sides. With the situation regarding the Northern Ireland backstop has been a mitigating factor in securing a deal.

Boris’ accelerating preparations for the economy, following effects of a no-deal Brexit, could be a card that plays in the UK’s favour in securing a deal with the EU. Savid Javid, also reaffirms this idea saying the funding is to ‘show Brussels that the UK is ready and willing countenance leaving without a deal in three months’ time’.

This approach, whilst prudent also brings into questions whether the country is being forced into a no-deal situation. Without taking into consideration the wider and unknown implications of no-deal Brexit, which could be detrimental. The shadow chancellor John McDonnell, has made it clear that the money being set aside in this budget, should be used more diligently and responsibly.

 “The government could have ruled out no deal, and spent these billions on our schools, hospitals, and people” John McDonnell argued in response the Conservatives preparations. It’s no doubt the UK is facing an existential crisis not just in terms of the condition of Brexit, but with our healthcare, education and welfare state deficits. All in which have disadvantaged the most vulnerable in our society.

With the current state of Brexit Negotiations, having a government prepared for the future is necessary, whatever that future may be. However, it also seems that this is the only card on the table that the Conservatives have for Brexit; ultimately a no-deal one.

What’s also painful to see is that the budget will no doubt be funded by taxpayers or increased borrowing. It could be deemed a waste from a taxpayer’s perspective given it’s not being reinvested currently into the country. The extra funding could be used to curb issues within our education system, the NHS with waiting times and those suffering on universal credit.

With the government seep ramping this emergency budget. It’s evident that this pro-Brexiter cabinet has no hesitation making a no-deal Brexit a reality. This, unfortunately, might be at the expense of millions within society.

Hopefully, Boris’ plans for social policy reform in the UK (increasing police numbers, increasing per-pupil funding, etc) in conjunction with this Brexit budget can be a recipe for success. But only time will tell if this happens.

The question that remains is this emergency budget justifiable given the direction it’s pulling us towards, which is a no-deal outcome.

Coco Gauff and the Importance of Sporting Perspective

After her breakthrough performances at Wimbledon, the American exited the Washington Open in the First Round this week. While disheartening, this is only just the beginning.

Hype – it’s simply impossible to escape it (and sometimes not to believe it) in sport. You only need to ask any member of the England football team over the last 30 years to understand the pressures and damage it can put on even the greatest sports personalities. It will come as no surprise to Cori ‘Coco’ Gauff then, that the buzz around her is real. Coming straight from the junior competitions, she’s made an instant impression on the professional tennis world in 2018-19.

After making it through all three qualifying rounds at SW19, she qualified for the main Wimbledon draw as the youngest competitor since 1991, aged 15 years and 3 months. As if that wasn’t good enough, she then went on to beat a certain Venus Williams in the opening match and eventually made it all the way to fourth round. The player who put her out? Only the eventual champion Simona Halep.

Gauff during her Wimbledon run. Source: Stylist

Yet despite her clear potential, fantastic attitude and potential future stardom, there was an air of deflation around when she failed to progress past the first round in Washington this week. My question is, why? Looking at it objectively, it’s another fantastic achievement that she even qualified for the tournament in the first place. Gauff herself was in an upbeat mood, saying:

“Every loss, there’s something I learn from that, so I learned something about myself.”

Cori Gauff after the match
Source: CNN

At just 15 years of age though, should she really have to explain herself like this? Yes, she’s a clear winner with the drive and passion that you need to succeed in sport, but when she refers to her personal learning, it underlines just how young she is. Think about what you were doing at 15: finding your way in the world, trying to understand who you are, what you’re good at and where you fit in. Now imagine contending with all that, while also being expected to perform on the world stage of tennis.

Wimbledon’s history teenage moment.

Boris Becker’s 1985 Wimbledon win, while still only 17, was history making and rightly so, because it was virtually unheard of. Gauff is still two years younger than Becker was and when she does win her first professional title, she will rightly join that hall of fame. Until then though, talk of her as an ‘overnight teen sensation’ could prove detrimental to her future development. There’s no doubt she’s incredibly talented, has the right attitude on and off court and could very well be a superstar in the future, but she’s not there yet.

Even in writing this piece, I’ve fallen into the trap of pigeonholing Gauff too much as a player who is ‘only 15’, but these are the bare facts. Let’s just celebrate when she plays great tennis, look to the future with hope and try and tone down the talk of her as ‘the next big thing’. While potential is there to be fulfilled, sporting history, football especially, is awash with those who never lived up to the dreaded hype. Have we learned nothing from Freddie Adu, Michael Doyle, or, arguably Wayne Rooney?

Lets Talk About: Blood Donation

Picture this for a moment. You are given an ability/superhero power to save the lives of 12 people – family, friends or even strangers. Would you reject this opportunity? Or what if, during your lifespan you could save the lives of over 500 people. Would that be more appealing? (Aside from the chance to finally live out the inner superhero powers you have always wanted).

With the sheer value placed in society on the sanctity of life, one would expect that many would leap at an opportunity painted like the scenario described above. However, when this is presented daily in the form of blood donations, the statistics of registered blood donors say otherwise.

Statistics and Figures

According to NHS Blood and Transplant, more than 97% of people eligible to donate blood are currently not doing so. To meet the current demand of blood, around 135,000 new donors are required each year. A closer examination at the data reveals a stark difference between the ethnicity of the donors. 5% of blood donors are from BAME (Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic) backgrounds with the lowest figures being black peoplemaking up less than 1% of total blood donors. Thus, an urgent priority for the NHS is to increase the number of blood donors, specifically 40,000 black donors which has been embedded into their 2017-2022 strategic plan.

What is a Blood donation?

Blood Donation is a process that involves volunteers donating blood which is used in the treatment of patients with medical conditions such as anaemia, cancer, blood disorders as well as those that have lost blood through childbirth, accident or surgery. 

The journey from donation to transfusion

An initial health screening of the donor is conducted to determine the safety of the donor’s blood and whether or not it is in fact safe for the donation to take place. The painless donation process, lasting between 5-10 minutes, results in around a pint of blood removed from the donor. The human body has a remarkable capacity of replacing all the cells and fluids that have been donated which is usually within 24 hours. The donation is then separated into its components (red blood cells, plasma and platelets) and transported to blood centres for further checks and quality control. Once completed, the blood is then delivered for patients in need of blood transfusion. 

A day in the life of a sickle cell patient

Precious Gaza – Sickle cell patient undergoing a red blood cell exchange 

“I was an ill child growing up. Though I didn’t quite understand what was wrong with me, I remember always being in pain and on a constant dose of medications. ” Faith Adex, a sickle-cell patient reports. Sickle cell anaemia is a hereditary disease, prevalent within African and Caribbean communities that causes abnormal red blood cells leading to periodic episodes of pain called crisis. “Being in a constant state of pain became my norm, my crisis can happen at any point during the day and vary in severity. At times, they can last a few hours or weeks”. Despite medical advances, there is currently no cure for sickle cell disease which means that patients rely on lifelong treatments from medications to red blood cell (RBC) exchange in severe cases. RBC exchange involves the removal of a patient sickle blood in exchange for donor blood.

Why do people not donate?

Barriers accounting for the low number of registered blood donors have mainly centered around the lack of awareness and accessibility. Ongoing campaigns such as “What’s Your Type” and #MyDonorStory aims to increase awareness of blood types by conducting free blood tests and educating the public on the importance of blood donations and recruit more priority donors’ groups. The basic requirements for blood donors are to be fit and healthy, between 17 and 66 years and weigh between 50kg and 160kg. However, there are several restrictions affecting some potential donors such as previous medical conditions, sexual relations, injections and any previous transfusions. 

What is being done to increase the number of blood donors?

In an age of civic responsibility, it is vital that we see blood donation and increasing awareness as our duty to the society. “We do not tend to react unless it hits home. I started donating blood when my mum got ill and required a blood transfusion to save her live. I want to be that hope / blessing in someone else’s life” – Fidelis Olaniran ,blood donor. NHS Give Blood has collaborated with a number of organisations such as Melanin Medics to launch an upcoming blood drive “Black Blood Appeal’ to demystify the blood donation experience and increase the number of BAME donors.

End the lack of awareness:

For more information on registering to become a blood donor: https://my.blood.co.uk

Check your blood type with the Blood.co.uk website

Organisations working to increase the amount of blood donations:

https://www.blood.co.uk/news-and-campaigns/

https://www.melaninmedics.com/blackbloodappeal

Is Megan Rapinoe Inspiring a New Age of Dominance in Women’s Football?

Megan Rapinoe is all the talk of the sports world right now and rightly so. The 2019 Women’s World Cup winner, Golden boot winner with 6 goals and also winning the Finals player of the year trophy; a star for the US women’s team, really making a difference in her side. But let’s briefly see how she got to where she is now being recognised as one of the best in world.

Megan’s rise to prominence

Megan Rapinoe is a winger for Reign FC, scoring 37 goals in 75 appearances. For the US she’s scored an impressive 50 goals in 157 appearances and has helped them win back to back World Cups and a Gold medal at the 2012 Olympic games.

Rapinoe first took headlines in 2016, however not for football. She took a knee during the american national anthem in a show of support for American Football outcast Colin Kaeperknick who also took the knee during the anthem in protest against the injustice of the American police and justice system. Rapinoe took a lot of backlash for this, but she stuck to her guns.

In fact, Rapinoe is quite the political activist, being part of the LGBTQ community she’s been very outspoken about LGBTQ rights. She also took the lead in rejecting the US team’s visit to the White House after their World Cup win which again raised some eyebrows among some, specifically Donald Trump supporters

Bridging the gender pay gap

Megan Rapinoe didn’t stop there, she’s also been vocal in the media about gender inequality reflected in the salary difference between the men and women’s football teams.

The US women’s team generate more money than the men since the US women’s team won their 3rd world cup in 2015. In 2016-2018 the women generated a revenue of $50.8 million in total compared to the men’s team who generated $49.9 million.

Just for qualifying for a World Cup, each male player would receive $108,695 however a female player would only receive $37,500. The USA Women’s team have won the last two World Cups whilst the Men’s team didn’t even qualify for the 2018 World Cup.

The issue of equal pay is a complicated one, but the bottom line for the US women’s team is correct: They do deserve more money primarily for their dominance in Women’s football and also for their entertainment and attention they add to the sport.

Even rapper Snoop Dogg was in support of the Women’s football team increased pay!

Dancing into a new age of dominance

Apparently Megan Rapinoe can do nothing right in the mind of her critics. In celebration of her team’s World Cup win as well as her own individual awards, Rapinoe has drawn more criticism for the videos of her dancing and claiming that she deserves this success. She’s also been flagged for seeming to sign fan memorabilia without making any eye contact with fans.

What Megan Rapinoe is doing is nothing different to what other sport stars of the world have done in the past or even still do now. For example Conor McGregor, Floyd Mayweather, Zlatan Ibrahimovic or Lewis Hamilton who are all generally loved but certainly come across arrogant in some of their celebrations.

What Megan has achieved at this world cup should be celebrated and she is well within her right to do so.

One thing is for sure, Megan Rapinoe’s comments off the pitch has drawn attention to the talent and excitement Women’s football has to offer on the pitch. With as much backlash she’s received, the dominance of the USA Women’s Football team and the traction they have gained for women’s football is propelling a sport which for many years has been largely underappreciated.

The Lion King: A Story of Hope For Black Fathers Everywhere

The Lion King’s remake has been hotly anticipated, by the world. None more so than the black community, and age-old fans of the Lion King movie.

Image result for LION KING REMAKE
Posters for The Lion King remake featuring Donald Glover as Simba, Beyonce Knowles-Carter as Nala and Chiwetel Ejiofor as Scar.

Lion King promises to be another cultural bastion for the black community likened to that of the Black Panther movie released 12th February 2018. With a lineup comprising of Beyonce, Donald Glover and Chiwetel Ejiofor and set in the continent of Africa.

The Swahili phrase “Hakuna Matata”, became understand by our generation to be an African term and children would sing it in class. Lion King, alongside other movies such as Toy Story, hopes to reconnect the old and new generations.

What has an old movie being remade tell us about the current time?

In an ever-changing social landscape, Lion King could not have come at a better time: toxic masculinity is being challenged, men are becoming more emotional and fatherhood doesn’t seem like a dirty word. The story highlights something closer to home for the black community.

One twitter user said, “The Lion King told the story of a black man killed by gang violence and his children trying to make it in life without him.”

Simba is the lost young black man killed by intrafamily war and he has to go on this path to become his own man. This idea of seeking masculinity is one far too common in the black community.

Mufasa is the epitome of manhood, the alpha male of the pack and the king of the African kingdom of animals. Simba, his son is learning from his father about how to be a leader and to overcome adversity. His teaching was crucial to Simba in his early years.

Many argue that men are socialised to be violent. Whereas Simba uses violence as a last resort. He does not want to be violent. His father Mufasa taught Simba to navigate a line between mercy, rationale, emotions and fatherhood. A privilege not many young black men are afforded.

Image result for scar lion king
The new Scar in the 2019 Lion King movie vs the old Scar in the previous Lion King movie (1994)

Scar serves to remind us of the ever-present danger of evil, greed, malice and anger, as he desires to take the throne, and rule the kingdom with fear. Mufasa, to his detriment, affords him a lions share of good measure, and Scar in return kills him.

Why are there still a lack of movies about fathers and sons?

There is a rarity in movies about fathers and their sons. Yet is a reality for the black community.

One prominent example “The Pursuit of Happiness”, the story of a single father Chris Gardner who was left with his kid, struggling, sacrificing and never giving up on his dreams.

Image result for pursuit of happiness
The Pursuit of Happiness Will Smith and his real-life son Jaden Smith

One of the best quotes in the movie is ” Don’t ever let somebody tell you, you cant do something. Not even me, you got a dream, you gotta protect. People can’t do something they wanna tell you you can’t do it. If you want something, got get it. Period.”

The Importance of Fathers

Men teach boys how to be men, and there is a biological yearning for young boys to be with their fathers. As mentioned in my previous article Dope Black Dads, Father2 Father are all addressing the intergenerational gap between fathers and sons. The intersections between men and their children, fathers and their boys whilst revamping the way we see fatherhood in a racialised context.

The black community suffers most at the hands of fatherless homes. The African home is regarded as one where the father is present but emotionally absent. However, the Caribbean home is one where the father is not present at all.

Lion King is a visual representation of how significant it is for a father to guide his son and to be his protector. To be able to teach his son the world and everything in it.

Representation is changing, gender roles are reforming and the social justice issues are being ironed out. With a renewed lense on such movies, we can see Lion King in a re-energised light.

I hope Lion King reminds us all of the importance of fathers and how they are needed, wanted, loved and appreciated.

Boris’ Treasured No.10

Jeremy Hunt and Boris Johnson during the results of the leadership contest. Where Mr Johnson came out triumphantly on top.
Credit: Sky News

A day of happiness, confusion, or bewilderment. I wouldn’t know the answer to that. But in the UK we are coming to terms with the fact that Mr Johnson, a failed Mayor of London, and an even more disappointing Foreign Secretary, is now our Prime Minister. Mr Johnson captured 92,153 votes compared to Jeremy Hunt’s 46,656, showing a double majority within the Conservative party. A turnout of 87.4% for 160,000 Conservative members seems to characterise Boris as the “golden boy” for the Tory party.

Congratulations are in order for our new Prime Minister after his democratic election by the “will of the people”, a decision made by 0.2% of the UK population. Boris has promised to repay the trust to the people who have put him power by uniting both his party and the country, delivering Brexit and defeating Corbyn.

Now the questions point to what is to follow in the coming months for the new resident in No. 10. Boris Johnson will face many difficult questions from day one in his appointment. Will his “can-do” spirit and campaign promise to ‘deliver, unite, defeat and energise’ frame his approach to the many important issues which have been in the headlines this past week?

https://twitter.com/vahrazhonary/status/1152281572344827905?s=20

Persian Gulf Tensions

With tensions in the Persian Gulf greatly intensifying between Iran and the UK, concerns point to how the new Prime Minister will be able to manage this sensitive crisis. In a back and forth watched closely by the world, on July 4th the UK seized an Iranian tanker Grace 1 off the coast of Gibraltar, due to suspicions it was shipping oil to Syria against EU regulations. The UK had a tanker seized in the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. Iran refused to accept the reasoning for the blocking of the tanker, alleging the UK had done the bidding of the US by blocking trade.

With this increasing geopolitical tension, there are worries that Boris Johnson will have to mediate between relationships with the US and E3. After Trump pulled out of the Iranian nuclear deal in 2018 and recent actions from the US heightening tensions with Iran, the UK’s involvement in this issue could mean being pulled into another conflict similar to that of Iraq in 2003.

https://twitter.com/PDNewsfa/status/1154003013327101952?s=20

On balance, Mr Johnson will have to play a part in salvaging the Iran deal, which other E3 members France and Germany are involved in. Furthermore, the economic effects of any blockade in the Strait of Hormuz will be felt around the world. 1/5 of the worlds oil passes through this key strategic waterway. But with Trump’s declaration on hammering Iran with further sanctions, and our uncertain future relationship with Europe, this is unfamiliar terrain that our new Prime Minister will have to navigate.

Nazanin Zighari-Ratcliffe

Richard and Nazanin Ratfcliffe
Credit: Middle East Monitor

Boris Johnson’s previous credentials as Foreign Secretary definitely rings alarm bells given that he is meant to be the face that represents our country on a global scale, acquiring trade deals post-Brexit or attending conferences such as G20. His failure to aid Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe and handle her case with any of the prudence or dilligence required, meant she has suffered tremendously, while in Iranian custody.

His remarks around the sensitive issue during his leadership contest caused Iranian propaganda to be targeted at Mrs Ratcliffe, causing further allegations of Ratcliffe being a spy and arguably worsened her position. Richard Ratcliffe has made it evident that the Prime Minister will have to resolve this issue with the Iranian government to get Nazanin Ratcliffe released.

With the news that Nazanin suffered alleged torture from her psychiatric ward, our then Foreign Secretary’s approach to this complex affair draws into question his abilities to respond to this and other critical foreign questions at a time when the UK’s position seems uncertain.

Plans for Brexit and the UK Economy

Of course, there is the elephant in the room which is dealing with Brexit. This one Boris has made clear that he has no hesitations pulling the UK out of the EU come the end of October. But with the slim majority that he has inherited from Theresa May, it raises speculation whether the rest of parliament will agree with his mandate for Brexit or will this lead to another scenario akin to what Mrs May experienced with her deals constantly being blocked.

On the other hand, a snap election could be on the cards for Boris to get a larger majority. Crucially, this could make his plans for a no deal Brexit to be implemented more feasible, given that Boris can no longer suspend parliament.

Nigel Farage making it clear that the new Prime Minister will need a stronger majority to navigate the UK out of the EU.

As much as Boris is an interesting character in UK politics, his ability to win elections and votes is recognised so calling election at this moment could be in his favour. Disarray, division and the anti-semitism row within the Labour party with vultures circling over the premiership of Jeremy Corbyn could be the catalyst Johnson needs to seize the initiative, before it is forced upon him. A Conservative majority of only two is not going to stick around for long.

Nonetheless a decisive plan for dealing for Brexit is needed, as the UK economy is suffering slowdown due to uncertainty. Confidence in investing in the UK economy has been deterred, with companies such as Nissan, Bank of America, Ford and more, beginning plans to restructure their businesses within the UK. Boris Johnson must be able to seek all possible options before pulling the trigger on a no deal Brexit and causing further blocks in Parliament.

Rising knife crime within the UK

There is no doubt that within many areas in the UK are shocked by the rise in knife crime. Within London alone there has been 78 deaths since the start of 2019, compared to 132 homicides in 2018. This growing knife epidemic has to be challenged with effective measures from the government working alongside the communities. Constantly waking up to news of a young person stabbed to death, makes me ponder what the government is doing to tackling this.

Would it have to come to a point where MP’s will have to suffer the same ordeals that mothers and fathers go through when burying their children, before anything changes? I hope that Boris Johnson understands that something has to be done to mitigate and challenge this attitude to a epidemic, which has been around during his time as Mayor of London.

Final Thoughts

Even though many of us may have not wanted Boris Johnson as our PM, there was a definite need for a new one, as the morale and energy that has been displayed in Parliament of late has been sluggish and uninspiring. Admittedly it’s early days to judge on our Prime Minister’s performance for domestic and social policy. One thing I know for sure is that come 31st of October “Do or Die Brexit” is a reality. But the aftermath? It’s all down to perception. Economic stutters, immediate recession or accelerating growth. In the meantime we all live in Boris land until another Prime Minister comes along. We may not be waiting too long.

Lets Talk About: Islam And British Values

by Umar Zeshan Bhatti

When a report highlights that more than a third of Britons believe that Islam is a threat to the British way of life, we have to question how and why?

Does the way Muslims are reported in the mainstream media have an impact? It is difficult for anyone to argue that Muslims do not receive disproportionate amount of negative media coverage. For instance, between 2006 and 2015, on average in the US, a terror attack committed by a non-Muslim (or where the religion was unknown) received 15 headlines, while those committed by Muslim extremists received 105 headlines. it any wonder then, that the first image that comes to people’s minds when you say the word ‘terrorist’ is of a Muslim.

British values

The British values, according to Ofsted, are democracy, rule of law, individual liberty, mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs and of none. However, when someone talks of British values, it is thought of going to the pub and drinking late into the night. But could that change now? Could we have The Great British Bake-Off as part of the values? The point is that values are always changing. They may not have been similar 50 years ago and are always evolving. So it makes you wonder what really are ‘British values’ and are they very different to, say, European, or American, Australian or Indonesian values? 

Another point to ponder is, are British values the same for every Brit? Does each household within the UK believe in and emphasise the same values? There are bound to be similarities of course, but who really decides what is ‘officially’ a British or non-British value?    

Integration

To be frank, the only time in the recent past I have come across a discussion of what British values are has been in a context of a discussion about Muslims. Muslims have been accused of not integrating into Westerns society properly and have been seen as a living threat.

Does the fact that Muslims look different, dress differently in some ways mean their values are any less ‘British’? 

I believe as a Muslim who goes to the Mosque, doesn’t hang out at the pub, doesn’t even like tea very much, I am no less British than anyone else. I’ve seen a lot of definitions of integration, but the one that really resonates is one by the Caliph of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community who put things into perspective when he said:

“If there are religious differences that exist between us, such as men and women sitting separately or if Muslim women observe Hijab, it does not affect our integration into society. Rather, true integration requires that all people live peacefully with one another, manifest a spirit of love and kindness and, whether male or female, use all their faculties and capabilities to serve their nation and to help it advance.”

Conflict of interest

I don’t think a uniformity in behaviour equals integration, because will always behave differently to one another in some respects and similar in others and that’s how we are as humans. Rather, uniformity in a desire to help one another and to help one’s nation progress and to contribute towards its advancement is in reality the yardstick for integration. 

Otherwise, will a thief be more integrated into Britain than an immigrant just because he drinks tea or speaks with a fluent British accent? Even if the immigrant come to the UK and raises funds for charities to help his adopted nation? 

There will always be clashes in how people behave, dress and speak and so tolerance is essential. Some practices in Islam are viewed as backwards. For example, not making physical contact with people of the opposite gender or women choosing to wear a burqa or Hijab. 

When taking this into consideration and seeing if these practices fall into the category of ‘British values’, I would urge the reader to remember that that freedom of choice is also a value that we so proudly champion here in the UK.

In life, there will never be a complete acceptance. 

Therefore, we should be willing to accept the differences in modern multicultural Britain we live in and move forward. Our efforts should be concentrated on what brings us together – as stated by the Holy Qur’an.

Umar Zeshan Bhatti has completed his LLB at London South Bank University in 2019. From September 2019, he will be studying the LLM in International Human Rights at City University. He is interested in Human Rights. He is trying to challenge the negative perception of Muslims in the media and he is a member of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Youth Association. Follow him on Twitter @UmarZBhatti97

Boris’ Reign Begins, Now Brexit Blues

0

With the Conservative leadership campaign having resulted in the previous Foreign Secretary and London Mayor Boris Johnson entering No.10. The bigger question is about the current state of Brexit. The new president of the European Commissioner being Ursula Von der Leyen has proposed hopes for a delayed Brexit.

Ursula Von der Leyen- Presidential Elect of The European Commission (source: getty)

This new elect wasn’t met well by the Brexit Party. It has shaken up the political landscape following the European Elections where they were able to pull off a surprise result winning 29 out 73 seats in European Parliament. Further questions have been asked about the effects of Brexit on the country with ongoing uncertainty being a common theme amongst the whole nation.

Officials don’t seem to know where the dice will fall. If we are to leave on the 31st of October Johnson has made it clear that he would pull the UK out of the EU without a deal. Even stating “do or die”.

“We are getting ready to come out on 31 October. Come what may,” he said. When asked to confirm this, adding: “Do or die. Come what may.” – Boris Johnson adamant of pulling the UK out of the EU on the 31st of October no matter the outcome.
(source: guardian)

Even more bold of him was his attempt to suspend Parliament resulting in MPs being sent home for the 2 weeks in order to execute his plans of a no-deal Brexit. This was further blocked by MPs who advocated that MPs should be able to sit in on the events running up the 31st of October, where the motion was passed 315 to 274 a majority of 41.

There are worries that following his appointment as the new Prime Minister, the Johnson government may receive a potential backlash over fears they will be blamed for the aftermath of Brexit in the likelihood that it is devastating.

“People are shaken. The basis on which we have worked all our careers suddenly feels challenged”

Simon McDonald, Head of the Foreign Office
Simon McDonald, Head of the Foreign Office Highlighting Fears For The Civil Service In The Midst Of A Johnson Government.

Civil servants have been frantically trying to piece together contingency plans for the past 3 years. But with the attitude towards Brexit becoming much of a ‘values project’, it has made things difficult for Whitehall to come up with a genuine strategy, given the differing values on Brexit for Remainers or Brexiters.

Eyes are also being pointed to the value of the Pound which last Wednesday fell 1.24 below the dollar, following Brussels’ rejection of the Irish backstop. From an investor’s perspective avoiding investment in the UK amidst uncertainty with Brexit is likely. The plans for concrete contingencies in place for businesses in the UK, in the scenario of a no deal or hard Brexit, means that investors may wish for another extension.

In a few months’ time the pendulum for the pound could swing either way. The effects on the UK are now being reflected within the economy although the UK has been resilient and hasn’t fallen into macroeconomic catastrophe following the referendum result – even with worries cast by the Governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney. But what is noticeable, is a fall of investment within the UK which is no doubt due to the economic slowdown because of the tensions and toll Brexit negotiations and May’s government has had. Leaving several investors with no assurance of investing within the UK.

For me and much of the country, Brexit has become a nuisance. It is constantly being covered by the news and very little has actually been cleared up. The same scares of economic slowdown and loss of jobs from one side contrasted with the high hopes of enlightenment are confusing and creating apathy.

The country wants this episode of Brexit Madness to be put to be bed one way or another, and hopefully come October 31st it will all be resolved. Maybe through a second referendum, or a miraculous deal with Brussels or a no deal Brexit. Nonetheless our stamina as a whole has been drained by this chapter, and it’s time for a new one to be put in place, and my hopes is for Mr Johnson to do so.

Noel Gallagher vs Lewis Capaldi: The Tragic State of Pop Culture

Lewis Capaldi is making headways, having sold over a million albums worldwide. While we may personally find Capaldi’s music drab and depressing, we’re even more confused by how his music matches up with his social media fuelled millennial joker persona.

Take the TV advert for his album for example: Capaldi sits in funny positions, saying funny self-deprecating things about his girlfriends, being…funny? Meanwhile, his miserable hits drone on in the background. The paradox is laughable, but perhaps not for the reasons Capaldi intended.

Lewis Capaldi’s TV Advert for his debut album

In defence of Capaldi, his humour is undeniably relatable and the success of it is understandable – his unflattering selfies are reminiscent of the type of Snapchat streak you only hold with one of your best mates. While I’m not fan of his album, Divinely Hellish to a Hellish Extent, Capaldi is certainly talented and there is no reason why he doesn’t deserve his current success. It is therefore very easy to be conflicted by Noel Gallagher’s comments which started the war between the two musicians. In an interview with Radio X, Gallagher boldly states “music is f***ing wank at the moment”, continuing, “Who’s this Capaldi fella? Who the f***’s that idiot?”. Catch his comments at 23:15 mins in:

In theory, I share the same opinion as Gallagher, but I’m not sure what this says about me. Gallagher has managed to stay relevant with ready-to-soundbite insults, touring off the back of his success with Oasis, and holding a very public feud with brother Liam. Rather than brush off the Manc’s uncalled for comments like most of his other victims, Capaldi reacted with a video on Snapchat. The singer wrote “What a day. It’s Father’s Day and I’m getting slagged off by a man who’s old enough to be my da. I’ve never been more happy. Happy Father’s Day, Noel.” Gallagher then tweeted this video of his 11 year old son, telling Capaldi to find “some joy” in his music.

Following this, Capaldi used his set at Glastonbury to mock Gallagher, walking onto the stage decked out in a khaki parka and a t-shirt emblazoned with Noel’s face in a love heart. It is clear that Capaldi refuses to be intimidated by Gallagher’s provocative remarks. Capaldi then posed with Liam Gallagher, which would have only incensed Noel further.

View this post on Instagram

R KID @glastofest

A post shared by Lewis Calamari (@lewiscapaldi) on

Laying into him in an interview with Variety magazine, Gallagher stated:

“F—ing Chewbacca should enjoy his 15 minutes. The greatest day of his life that I slagged him off or called him an idiot. It’s the greatest day of his f—ing life so far. He’s just thinking, “Wow!” Well, I know you’re Scottish and all that, but f—ing hell! It is like a third world country, but for f—‘s sake, man, you must have had a better day than this. Surely!”

Many Scots were rightfully offended by Noel’s description of Scotland as a “third world country”. Aside from demeaning a nation in one swoop, the term itself is no longer considered politically correct. Capaldi swiftly changed his Twitter photo to himself as Chewbacca and his handle to ‘Chewis Capaldi’. Capaldi certainly knows how to play to his audience and his adept use of social media draws attention to the fact that Noel Gallagher is older, less in touch and unable to play into the hands of Generation Z.

Chewis Capaldi
Source: @LewisCapaldi Twitter

Capaldi then made a winning move last weekend at TRNSMT festival, making a grand entrance wearing a Chewbacca mask, which he is auctioning for the charity Tiny Changes, having already raised over £5000.  It’s fair to say he has outdone Gallagher:

Capaldi’s outwitting of Gallagher’s comments is certainly laudable. With hope, Noel Gallagher might think twice about his self-constructed role of the UK’s omnipotent cultural critic. Oasis was one of the most successful bands to have come out of Britain, but Noel’s continual criticism of Britain’s youth culture highlights his exclusion from it. As a 52-year-old, is the ex-frontman supposed to understand youth culture? In his interview with Variety, Gallagher stated that “I meet young people, and they’re so culturally lost at the moment. All they can do, young people, is take pictures of each other.” With his avid use of social media to subvert cultural snobs such as Gallagher, Lewis Capaldi has managed to weaponise comedic pictures and social channels to undermine a showbusiness bully. Yes, all young people do is take pictures of each other, this suggests, and Noel Gallagher cannot be part of it. Capaldi arguably hit the perfect nerve, showing the former lead vocalist of Oasis that he is no longer relevant to modern popular culture.

Noel Gallagher performing with his High Flying Birds
Source: The Spectator

Conversely, Capaldi completely played into Gallagher’s hands. Noel has received press attention he clearly so desperately seeks, with no actual detriment to his public perception. I’m not sure if I agree with Capaldi’s decision to dedicate the opening of his set to making fun of Gallagher. Playing Glastonbury is the highlight of many artists’ careers and an opportunity for Capaldi to create a moment in history as a pop singer at the peak of his popularity. By wearing a Gallagher t shirt, Capaldi exemplified the argument that millennials have no youth culture of our own. However controversial it may have been, Noel Gallagher was entitled to state his opinion. By reacting so heavily to Gallagher’s Radio X interview, Capaldi has essentially demonstrated an inability to accept criticism. Gallagher might be an irritating figure, but the success of Oasis did earn him his stationed spot in the music industry, whether he remains relevant or not.

Loving life in funny sunnies at The Brits
Source: Edinburgh Live

With his talent and popularity, Lewis Capaldi’s music is not going anywhere soon. Although I might not like his songs, it is heartwarming to see a star with both a sense of humour and humility take the limelight. He is certainly more of a likeable character than Noel Gallagher, who pops up every now and then to insult someone.

I can’t help feeling, however, that if a feud between a fading rock star and the latest pop star is the most current British cultural news, then Gallagher may have a point. It is certainly no Blur vs Oasis. However, if millennial musicians are taking themselves less seriously, it might reflect a refreshing awareness that pop music is not the be all and end all. In the meantime, the battle has certainly provided plenty of enjoyable entertainment for the public.