Home Blog Page 37

The Power of Silence in an Age of Noise

In his 1670 Pensées (Thoughts), French philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal wrote that “All of humanity’s problems stem from man’s inability to sit quietly in a room alone.” The problem of avoiding quiet, solitary thought is not a new one, but to exist in the twenty-first century is to surrender to noise to a degree unprecedented in human history. So accustomed have we grown to the constant presence of noise in fact, that a 2014 meta-study published in Science Magazine, found that most of us would rather receive electric shocks than spend a few minutes in total silence.

On our front doorsteps, we are greeted with loud traffic. Upon entering the local supermarket or shopping mall, our each and every step is forcibly serenaded by popular music. Train and bus journeys are punctuated by screeching safety announcements and the tinny vibrations of fellow passengers’ headphones. Moreover, the “noise” we encounter is not only “sound”. The instant gratification of television, podcasts and YouTube can undoubtedly add value to our lives, but also tempt us away from the periods of silence that were once a staple of the human experience, even after the industrial revolution. On Twitter, Instagram and Facebook, we scroll through hundreds of adverts, images, news articles and torrid political and personal exchanges. We are adjusted to chaos.

Man using social media SOURCE: www.distel.com

In his 2017 book “The Power of Silence Against the Dictatorship of Noise” Guinea-born Cardinal Robert Sarah complained that “The modern world generates so much noise, that seeking moments of silence have become both harder and more necessary than ever before,” and that our noisy lives leave us feeling “isolated, lonely, and restless, not knowing how to conquer our personal demons”. Sarah’s grim analysis of modern “noise”, although presented in his Christian framework, is undeniably rooted in empirical fact.

Noise has an adverse effect on our beings

The pollution of constant noise is a demonstrable emotional and physical drain on our bodies and minds. Long-term exposure can take years off our lives. In short but equally as uninvited doses such as through loud restaurant music, it may “suppress your ability to taste & dulls the sense, masking flavour”, while making it impossible to make conversation.

Conversely, evidence suggests that increased quiet improves our happiness and health. A 2015 study found that adults experiencing insomnia found relief in the form of improved sleep quality and less daytime impairment after undergoing a 6-week intervention of mindfulness meditation. Other research has demonstrated that silence can regenerate brain cells. Even a few minutes of quiet per day may help lower blood pressure, boost the immune system and promote good hormone regulation. A 2006 paper found that just two minutes of silence relieves tension in the body and brain and is more relaxing than listening to music.

Religions have for centuries acknowledged that silence is a powerful tool to contemplate that which is bigger than ourselves (i.e. a deity) and to remove ourselves from the stressful thoughts of daily life to examine what is essential. The Order of Carthusians, founded in Eleventh-century France, lives in strict silence and solitude in order to focus solely on their contemplation of God. Most Christian denominations encourage one to reflect and pray in silence throughout one’s day. Meditation has been practised by numerous cultures since antiquity and was recorded earliest in the Hindu tradition. In overwhelmingly secular modernity, the crave for quietness and contemplation has led to a renaissance in yoga and meditation classes, and the commercial success of apps such as Headspace and Calm.

Man praying in Temple SOURCE: Unsplash

Although periods of silence seem ever more difficult to stumble across in modern life, there remain some simple measures to be taken, that are accessible to most of us. Short deep breathing exercises are proven to both calm and quiet the mind. Even a five to ten-minute meditation a day can reduce stress, centre our focus and allow us to witness our thoughts calmly. Peaceful walks are more difficult to encounter in urban areas, but they are still within reach in most cities.

What about the other side?

There are indeed times when silence can be just as dangerous as noise. Social interactions and voicing our concerns are just as necessary for us to thrive as are instances of self-reflection. The past few months have seen an eruption of political chaos, the undercurrents of which have long been brewing. Government responses to COVID-19 have plummeted countless industries into crisis and modified our personal lives with the introduction of somewhat unprecedented regulations on our movements and activities. The Chinese regime has used the crisis to further encroach on Hong Kong’s liberties as a semiautonomous territory, by pushing through a “national security law” that will allow political dissenters to be extradited to the kangaroo courts of mainland China, while citizen-journalists already operating there continue to “disappear”.

The May 25th killing of unarmed Black American George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer has too sparked global concern over police brutality and race relations. Reactions to the incident continue to fuel protests and counter-protests that have often spiraled into violence.

History itself is marred with battle, controversy and unravelling of consensus. However, debate, resistance and change are best achieved through nonviolent means, rather than the drowning out of reasoned reflection and the pressure to conform to the “noise” of popular sentiment or indifference. The choices and attitudes of one person are of course a mere drop in the stormy ocean with which we are surrounded, but autonomies of thought, speech, and ultimately the silence required to reflect and learn from our interactions, are crucial to the enhancement of our own lives and by extension that of our world.

Can reparations actually work?

Reparations are understood to mean cash payments for historical wrongdoing. If well designed, they are intended to acknowledge victims’ suffering, offer forms of redress and compensate for the violations both symbolically and materially. Such restitution not only risks insult to Black people by putting a price on their ancestors’ suffering, but also risks dividing society further, making it harder to build coalitions that solve the problems Black people face today. Could we solve this outwardly intractable issue in society today?

The assumptions around affirmative actions show a binary racial composition between a white majority inflicting inequality and a black minority that suffers underfoot. The bulk of any burden for historical guilt will be carried by the dwindling white majority, one that feels more threatened by cultural insecurity and economic strife by the day, presenting a risk of retaliation.

Is there a historical precedent?

Those who present the Jewish reparations as precedent run up against the headwinds of who represents the collective group of Black people to decide how this money will be distributed and who will they be accountable to? The Jews have Israel as a sovereign, a democratically elected government, whereas ‘blacks’ are a diverse people across the Americas and Africa, whose ancestors may or may not have faced persecution at the hands of white slavers or colonisers.

Within the intended recipient population, will they all receive the same or will there be an adjustment for need? Western governments could trace the genealogy of every white family and send a bill (detailing costs) to the descendants of every slaveowner, slumlord and oppressor during the 1600s through 1900s. After this, they can redistribute the lump sum to those Black people who can trace their history to the Atlantic slave trade or the cotton farms of the Southern US. This creates the issue of having to prove their ancestors were slaves.

Protest in support of the Black lives matter movement in New York. / KENA BETANCURKENA BETANCUR/AFP/Getty Images

Where do mixed race people fit in? Should a half-white, half-black person receive half the compensation or pay half the reparation and is this to themselves? Some people qualify as functionally white but had black slaves in their ancestry. We would need to qualify how their reparation would differ, if at all, from a darker skinned individual. We would also have to consider free black Americans that partook in owning slaves.

Just three years ago, taxpayers were still paying off government debt borrowed to pay millions in ‘compensation’ to wealthy slave owners. While some were well aware of the payments, which finally stopped in 2015, a lot of people had no idea modern Brits were paying off the money the British Treasury gave to people made rich through human suffering.

There have been stories circulating that British taxpayers only paid off the debt borrowed to ‘compensate’ wealthy slave owners in 2015. The calls to compensate descendants who have been forced to pay for the Abolition over generations are too tricky to address since it was in the form of loans given by banking institutions to make a one-time payment that will have long since dissipated. It is not as if we are directly paying the people whose families became rich through human suffering.

The African continent is considered to have been held back from developing because of continuous exploitation in various forms, while other stable developed nations could build intergenerationally more prosperous societies. There are modern-day forms of oppression faced by those who emigrated of their own accord to Western societies, such as being forced to live in more impoverished areas, less access to quality schooling, food and face obstacles to getting good jobs.

Map of history of slavery Africa to Americas / ArcGIS

Should the Russian government pay for centuries of serfdom in the former Russian Empire? Would all those who were forced to serve the Crown in her armies and navies under indentured servitude in the colonies, at great risk of disease and death and the impoverishment of their families back home as result?

Reparations via monetary compensation aren’t unfeasible because there aren’t people truly deserving of it, but because taking this stance and running it to its logical conclusion leads to absurdity and will likely exacerbate divisions.

What will reparations change?

Money won’t change unhealthy dietary patterns, or enhance language skills, or teach the habits on which thriving communities are built. Take the Middle East post-1973. They were nations who always felt cheated of their dues. With the surge in oil wealth, they saw their incomes quadruple overnight. Yet the nations did not progress. This is because the wealth of nations is built on their human capital. Oil incomes not only fail to enrich them but oftentimes incentivised behaviours that left them worse off in many ways than before.

Redefining reparations

If we reconsider reparations as remembrance, acknowledging the wrongs of the past and repenting for them; then yes, we should tackle the overly flattering image Westerners have of their civilising historical Imperial legacy.

We can commit to better opportunities for all, raising school attainment, access to private-sector jobs, universal health coverage, immigration policies that don’t exert ceaseless downward pressure on the least skilled workers, improved nutrition and less punitive enforcement of drug laws. But this will come from togetherness, by celebrating our shared humanity, not by stirring bitterness, demanding cash flowing from some to others in race-conscious fashion and ossifying societal divisions beyond repair.

“Pupils excluded from school might as well be given a prison sentence” – former Director-General

The term ‘school to prison line’ is a phrase used in youth work circles which has invariably become a reality for the thousands of working-class boys that are excluded from school.

For far too long, a broken education system and justice system has meant that the destiny of excluded teenagers in the UK is a life of crime. It has become such a stain on our system that the former Director-General of the Prison Service, Martin Narey, said “the 13,000 young people excluded from school each year might as well be given a prison sentence” in 2001.

‘School to Prison Line’ posters on put up on London Tube on GCSE results day (Picture: Aaamall/Twitter)

When does this phenomenon begin?

To fully understand the prison-to-school line, we must start at the very beginning; being sent out of class. Being told the leave a classroom is the first step to being permanently excluded from school. Removing a child from a learning opportunity is unquestionably counterproductive. It serves as a way to further increase the educational gap between students from more affluent backgrounds, who are less likely to have behavioural problems at school, and students from poorer backgrounds. At this very moment, our educational system should work to empathise and support our students, however, it instead criminalises and punishes the student.

The next step in the School-to-Prison Line is detention and isolation. Again, instead of support being offered to students who continue to get into trouble, sometimes for nonsensical reasons, schools will simply brand the child as a lost cause and find any excuse to temporarily exclude them. In 2017, there were over 410,000 fixed-term exclusions, this represents a 52% increase since 2013/14. This rise has, in part, been driven by the forced academisation of schools; headteachers are no longer held accountable for the students they choose to exclude.

Academisation is the process by which local authority maintained schools turn into academies. Depending on circumstances, a school can become an academy either by the ‘academy sponsorship’ route or on the ‘academy conversion’ route

What happens next?

Once a child has been temporally excluded, it is just a matter of time until they are permanently excluded. Excluded pupils are 7 times more likely to have special educational needs, it is clear that headteachers have become judge, jury and executioner, passing sentences over students they could never understand.

After being permanently excluded, children are sent to a pupil referral unit (PRU). At PRUs, teachers can focus their attention on trying to support students with a behaviour problem. However, the problem with PRUs are that they have become a breeding ground for gangs and criminal activity. This isn’t the fault of PRU institutions, it is the direct result of grouping together students with challenging behaviour. It is for this reason that only 1% of pupils at a PRU get 5 GCSE, and 85% of them end up in a young offender institution.

Young offender institutions operate as pipelines to prisons and with a 70% reoffence rate, many of the young offenders will end up in prison. At this point, the individuals will have become institutionalised and will struggle to escape a life of crime without the necessary support. If we spent the money it costs to exclude children from schools on measures to keep them in mainstream schooling, we could more than halve the number of children forced into a life of crime.

Colston’s down, now let us tear the education system down

The statue of the MP, merchant and prolific slave trader Edward Colston that was thrown into the Bristol Harbour by Black lives Matter protestors on Sunday 7th June. It has since been removed from the Harbour and moved to a secure location according to Bristol City council Authority.

On Wednesday 10th June the statue of 18th century Scottish slave owner Robert Milligan was removed by the council from West India Quay in London’s Docklands.

London mayor Sadiq Khan has called for a review of all statues and street names with links to slavery to work out whether they “should be taken down”.

Robert Milligan: Slave trader statue removed from outside London ...
The removal of a Scottish slave trader and owner Robert Milligan at West India Quay in London Docklands. Source: BBC

The removal of Colston’s status been a contentious issue. Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (known as Tommy Robinson) called on people to protest against it in an expletive-filled rant. Backlash protests under the guise of “save our statues” in London followed over the weekend, with violence against police and over 100 people arrested on Saturday.

Statues memorialise and immortalise individuals, presenting them as people to be revered. However, Colston is a murderer and his statue should be in a museum. The lack of historical knowledge around his endeavours means most people are not aware that he made his wealth by trading over 84,000 slaves.

Edward Colston was. a slave trader, trading over 84,000 slaves. Source: Telegraph

British historical education has failed

Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it,” said George Santayana. We are watching British histories failure to educate manifest. Collective amnesia, over-romanticisation and deliberately obtuse denial of Britain’s imperial and colonial history remain a crucial element to racism in Britain today.

Education, in theory, should be the great leveller and a tool to freedom. Instead, British history is devoid of wholesome historical truth and accuracy. History is written by the winner, for the winner. The proverbial loser never has their story told.

Many argue that we have Black History Month, a fixture in the UK since 1987. Children must learn beyond whips, chains and slaves, Malcolm x, Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks and Nelson Mandela.

The outrage surrounding Colston’s statue being removed alongside others portrays the lack of complicated historical diversity and the truth of national heroes. Instead, British history deceives the public about the horrors enacted on black people, rather than educating, informing and empowering individuals.

A diverse education system, exploring the breadth of black people, beyond trauma, and the breadth of our achievements, cultural significance and contributions is crucially needed. The education system continues to provide a wildly inaccurate history of Britains colonial past with teachers who do not look like us. Could ‘supplementary schools’ also form part of the answer?

Black supplementary schools can fight racism

British Black communities in the 1960s came together to create ‘supplementary schools’. They acted as resistance against the racism and inequality children faced in mainstream schooling. The schools were voluntarily led, taught by teachers, parents, church leaders and community activists.

Children playing in school. Source: Grazia.co.uk

British education for decades has left behind young black and ethnic minority boys. In the 1970s, Bernard Coard’s book “How the West Indian Child is made Educationally Subnormal in the British School System” was a how-to guide for black immigrant parents to navigate a system where their children are left behind. Additionally, children were being disproportionately sent to “ESN” (educationally subnormal) schools.

40 years later, in 2005 Brian Richardson’s book  “Tell it like it is” highlighted once again young black boys were being left behind by the education system, as exclusion and punishment rates were higher for black children.

Majority of white working class boys failing to get good GCSEs ...
School children taking their exams Source:dailyexpress.co.uk

GSCE figures for 2011/12, revealed 54.6 per cent of black children achieved five or more A-C grades including core subjects of Maths and English. In 2018 Research by Education think tank LKMco showed that “Black Caribbean boys’ attainment in London is 17 percentage points behind the London average for expected standards in reading, writing and maths by the end of primary school.”

Black supplementary schools can improve these statistics by spending more time developing the children academically and personally. Black teachers could also be the key to this.

Black Teachers are needed

Mainstream schools do not reflect British society in their teachers. In 2018, 92.9% of headteachers were White British, 85.9% of all teachers in state-funded schools in England were White British.

In 2019, ethnic minority teachers consisted of 11 and 17 per cent of the primary and secondary workforces, falling short of the 19.5 per cent who make up the UK population. 32 per cent of the school pupil population are from ethnic minority groups.

LKMco’s 2018 research also showed “non-black teachers can have lower expectations of black students and are more likely to negatively judge pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds”.

In supplementary schools, black teachers are the majority and have a special impact on Black students by being in the classroom. They are role models exposing Black students to other successful Black individuals, in turn boosting self-esteem and confidence, and improving grades.

National Association of Black Supplementary Schools Source:nabss.org.uk

The fight against racism is a marathon and revamping the education system is by no means a sprint. The removal of the statue is a start. As a community, we cannot wait for the system to accommodate us, we must accommodate our own. Black supplementary schools contribute to community cohesion and should be significant features in the black community, where all black children attend so they can view British Black history in its historical entirety.

Opinion on racial education: whose responsibility is it?

The death of George Floyd at the hands of former police officer Derek Chauvin has rocked the world, sparking protests across all 50 states of America and other countries – even in the UK. Protesting and speaking out are vital tools for change in regards to racism, but we also cannot ignore the importance of education. Whose responsibility is it; the oppressors, the oppressed, or the people in between?

Protests work – after just over 2 weeks of mostly organised and peaceful protests, with rare incidents of violent eruptions, real signs of change are being seen. For example, former officer Chauvin’s charges were escalated from third-degree murder and manslaughter to that of the second-degree. Although we cannot say that this happened because of protests and campaigning, there is no doubt that public pressure works.

Passion and unity are vital to creating and sustaining change, but history has also proven that education is a powerful tool that withstands the test of time.

Unfortunately, it is a fact that many black pupils in the UK tend to have access to limited resources during their schooling years due to many factors including racism, economic resources which in turn affects home choices and schooling. GOV.UK reveal some statistics that are certainly food for thought. For example, in the years 2017/18 the percentage of black children on average who attained a strong pass (grade 5 or above) in English and maths GCSE, was only 38.8% compared to white students with a percentage of 42.6%. However, these percentages vary by ethnic group specifically as 44.3% of black African children achieved a “strong pass” whereas only 26.9% of black Caribbean children did.

Black attainment gap; Source: Lambeth Council

We can also see this trend in the higher years of education where, for example, in the year 2017/18 only 5.1% of black pupils as a whole (percentages vary by specific ethnic groups within the category) achieved at least 3 A grades at A-Level, compared to 11% of white pupils – that’s more than double.

However, whilst there may be disparities in education growing up, I believe that where it is possible, we must all educate ourselves on issues of race and relations. I’ve seen many takes from pressuring white people to “speak out” against racism against black people, to some white people not seeing the need to be involved. Furthermore, some also argue that it is not the responsibility of black people to educate white people on racism, whereas others say that black people should help where they can. Who’s right and who’s wrong?

I must admit that I had no clue that there are so many statues of racists that stand, proud and tall. When Black Lives Matter protestors in Bristol pushed the statue of Edward Colston into the harbour, I hadn’t even realised that this statue existed and that many had campaigned for years for its removal before it was toppled over.

A diverse curriculum is essential for students to see the full picture of history, but of course, the full picture may not always be beneficial for a country to reveal. There are threads on twitter revealing the violent actions and racism of Winston Churchill, whereas an average history lesson will only show you his efforts in ending the war. These efforts were incredible of course, but does that mean that he does not deserve to be scrutinised?

I recently had a conversation that made me think about who is responsible for our personal education on these matters. I had written a Facebook post about microaggressions that I had experienced and that others had also probably experienced – one of them being white people tanning and commenting that they are as “dark as me.”

A facebook post by journalist Courtney Carr

Someone I know, who is white, seemingly challenged me on this as they could not understand why it would cause me offence. I didn’t see the need to explain why I didn’t like my skin tone being celebrated as an aesthetic on someone else. I advised them to use Google and they said that they did not need to, because they got their answer by asking me. Needless to say, it became a bit heated but in the end, although their challenge was worded in the wrong way , they simply did not understand and by sharing my experience, I caused them to think.

Recent events have shown the world that unity, power and knowledge are key in defeating racism. It is not the responsibility of black people to share their experiences, but I believe that it can also make the difference. It is the responsibility of everyone to learn when and where we can, so that real change can continue to take place.

Football is back-ish…

0

Why the remainder of the season isn’t as exciting as it should be.

The Bundesliga is back and the Premier League is soon to follow this in mid-June on the 17th. It’s fair to say that COVID-19 has rocked every industry in the world and the sports entertainment felt it’s harsh effects. Will football’s return be triumphant or marred with challenges?

Genuine concerns


Watford’s Troy Deeney rightfully said “he won’t be able to get a haircut in July due to safety features but has to perform in a match with 19 other people in close proximity. ” With a vulnerable 5-year-old at home he was one of the players protesting for a longer delay.

Danny Rose on his Instagram Live was also adamant that “he’s not willing to risk his life for the entertainment of others… peoples lives are at risk. Football shouldn’t even be spoken about coming back until the numbers have dropped massively.”


With other footballers speaking up for their safety, backlash has been evident from the general public. The players citing their families safety over and above the morale of the nation has created outrage.

Jadon Sancho of Dortmund facing Koeman and Alphonso David of Bayern Munich// Source: Sky Sports


The Bundesliga sets the pace


The Bundesliga has paved the way for football restarting due to the efficiency of Germany handling the COVID-19 crisis. The country’s R-value being around 0.76. This allowed the players to train from as early as late April as long as they maintained social distancing and used face masks.

The R-value is a numerical rating to indicate the ability of a disease to spread, with a higher number indicating greater spread of infection. A value above 1 will see exponential growth in the rate of infections and cases.

The matches so far have highlighted some great achievements showing what is missed about the beautiful game. Young Englishman Jadon Sancho notched his first-ever professional Hatrick against Paderborn. Likewise, 24-year-old Timo Werner is making headlines and attracting interests from the big clubs around Europe having 31 goals to his name this season. The biggest highlight is Alfonso Davies who is making the case for the best left-back in the world with his first European debut.


Is it working?


Bundesliga has tried a number of methods available to them to make the games entertaining in lockdown, from putting banners of fans across the stadium to streaming fan sounds to create a real-life atmosphere. For all of the organiser’s efforts to generate the atmosphere, without fans physically in attendance it remains sadly lacking.

Football is being used as a tool to lift the nations spirit but if the Bundesliga is any indicator of such a thing happening it might not do much for us in lockdown. Factoring in the safety of players, have we reached a point where force players who are scared to play because of the impact it can have on their family?

The justification can’t be because they get large amounts of wages that the general public can make them do what they don’t want. After all we are in a pandemic.

Premier League Stars Son, Alexander Arnold, Vardy, Pope// Source: Premier League


Money makes the Prem go round


Of course, the Premier League season was never going to be voided due to large sum of money that clubs across England would have to give back in their TV deals sponsorship. The Premier League has a deal that is worth £5 billion over 3 seasons televising 200 games stretching from 2019-2022. As each season is worth approximately £1.66 billion.

If this season had been voided roughly £1.1 – £1.2 billion would have to be returned back to Sky, BT and Amazon for not legally meeting the contractual requirement of televised games. That would have serious implications across the whole industry, such as job losses to the backroom staff, wages being cut to lower-tier teams and stadium employees. Simply put, money talks.

The BBC will be broadcasting 4 Premier League games for free for the first time in its history in a major step for the national broadcaster.

There’s has been an eagerly awaited return in the UK for football. Oliver Dowden, the Culture secretary has given the Footballing authorities the go-ahead for games to be played behind closed doors. Alongside football, other sports such as tennis, cricket, Formula 1 & rugby will soon make a return.


There are some exciting fixtures on the horizon- Arsenal v City, Tottenham Hotspur v Manchester United, Liverpool v Everton, with the likes of Pogba Rashford Martial and Bruno all playing together for this first time. Stars such as Kane, De Bruyne and Lacazette will be ready to make an impact.

However, these players are still essentially putting their lives at risk for entertainment. Viewership should hit record numbers but whether they’ll stay that way and be worth the risk is unclear. The jolt of excitement will slowly dwindles as thoughts of the next impending season loom. The fact that Liverpool mathematically only need two more wins in order to secure this season trophy is something most fans are dreading.

For now, football is back-ish…


A history of protest in a tired nation

People protesting against police brutality. Source:Policy Institute

Breonna Taylor, India Kager, Tyree Crawford, Sandra Bland, Tamir Rice, Mike Brown, Freddie Gray, Alton Sterling, Jamar Clark, William Chapman II, Walter Scott, Eric Harris, Eric Garner, Oscar Grant III and now George Floyd,  are just a few of the hundreds of people that have fallen victim to police brutality. The killing of George Floyd has left the nation weeping in anger, despair, anguish, and disgust. Amid all this havoc, many conversations have been on the topic of protesting. Some believe that peaceful protest is better, and others believe riots are needed during this time of despair. While the debate of protest has sparked the conversation not only in America but throughout the world, one thing is for certain: Protest is needed.  

A wood engraving depicting the Massacre in Virginia during Nat Turner’s Rebellion circa 1831. Sourrce:Creative Commons

Protest in the U.S.

Protest comes in various forms; it can be seen in the form of kneeling during the national anthem or rioting in the streets.  Black people have been protesting and revolting the systematic structure of racism since slavery rebellion. Nat Turner’s Rebellion was one of the more well known slave revolts, where Turner and a small group of slaves killed their master and family. The idea of speaking out against inequality followed suit throughout the 60’s and 70’s with the Civil Rights Movement and other movements during this time period.  In the Civil Rights Movement, you saw an amplitude of diverse protests, from bus boycotts to marches on Washington. Fast forward to modern day, Black people have participated in numerous protests to speak out against brutality against black people.

Violent and Non-Violent Protest

Colin Kaepernick and teammates kneeling during the National Anthem

Although protest is a form of expression led by a desire to make change for an unjust society, others feel the methods of protest can be extreme. Violent and nonviolent protest have been highly critiqued in their implementation. Recently, due to the death of George Floyd riots have exploded across all 50 states. The riots were met with an explosion of backlash from people across the country. President Trump has threatened to call the military to settle the “unrest” in some American cities .  

However, there has not been that much of a difference between the criticism over non-violent protest either. People forget the marches during the Civil Rights Movement were met with even more violence from the police and backlash from society. Fast forward to modern day society, this is no different.  For example, kneeling during American football was met with huge backlash and deemed inappropriate in 2016. Other nonviolent protest by Black Lives Matter was met with the same criticism.

Protest Matters

Numerous people protesting over George Floyd’s Murder. Source: FoxNews

The late Martin Luther King Jr. once stated protest “ the language of the unheard”. While this quote has been repeated a lot in the last few weeks, it is a statement that holds much truth. Black America is TIRED. They are tired of being treated as a constant target strictly based on something they cannot control – the color of their skin.

Far too many times society focuses on the act of protesting instead of the why. Although acts of racism are prohibited, minorities are still 2.5 more likely to be killed by the police than whites.  Basic human treatment is not a courtesy; it is a human right. A mother should never have to fear for the life of her black son from the people who are supposed to serve and protect.

Protest gives black people a voice in a world wanting to suppress it. No matter which type of protest is chosen to fight the fight against unjust action, protest is the language everybody needs to adhere to, or else social unrest will keep being present.

Are protests redundant weapons against racism?

London and multiple cities across the UK have experienced days of protests in solidarity against police brutality after the death of George Floyd at the hands of a white police officer.

Stars such as John Boeyga attended the march on Wednesday 3rd June and spoke out against the injustice. The solidarity in the black community was evident, the impact that the death of George Floyd has had on the black diaspora continues to be palpable.

Star Wars actor John Boyega lends voice to London Black Lives ...
John Boeyga holding up the renowned Black power fist. Source: skyfy.com

Protests are part of the black trauma cycle

Protests across the world in the UK, America and even Australia have shown us that black lives DO matter. The world responded, showing unparalleled support.

Ever since the beginning of the protests, protesters and other criminal justice reform advocates have proposed the banning of tear gas and certain chokeholds. Thankfully through court orders and policy changes, Minneapolis and Seattle have implemented these reforms. However, it is not enough, as the culture of the police remains toxic towards the black community.

George Floyd death: Thousands protest in London in solidarity with ...
Young protestors holding up signs Source: newsksy.com

Contemporarily when we see the death of a black person there is a cycle we have been manufactured into.

Black person killed>shock activism> performative activism surges>industry profits>media cycle ends>state retaliates against activists> allies return to biases> murder is acquited>short lived media resurgence>public forgets.

The cycle then restarts when another black person is killed. We must break this cycle. We need a longstanding movement, not one that dies out once the media no longer pays attention or when it is no longer trending on social media.

Protests demand longevity, organised chaos and careful management to be successful. The people are active agents to force change. Lives were once put on the line, protestors had everything to gain and nothing to lose. Saturated with western world comforts and first-world privileges do protests hold the same weight and magnitude as they did previously, during the Civil Rights era?

Boycott Institutions / Support black Businesses

Clinton Marks Anniversary Of Historic Montgomery Bus Boycott
Rosa Parks upn her arrest when she refused to sit at the back of the bus. Source: history.com

One of the greatest forms of protesting is a direct boycotting best epitomised through the Montgomery Bus Boycott in Montgomery, AlabamaRosa Parks was jailed for refusing to give up her seat on a public bus to a white man. At the time it was a violation of the city’s racial segregation laws.

The Montgomery Bus Boycott was sparked by the arrest of Rosa Parks on 1 December 1955. It was organized by Martin Luther King, Jr., a young baptist minister at the time. The boycott became a 13-month mass protest, and as a result, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that segregation on public buses was unconstitutional.

Those who took part in the boycott carpooled or walked miles to work and school. African Americans at the time accounted for 70% of the Montgomery bus ridership meaning the municipal transit system during the boycott suffered severely.

Montgomery Bus Boycott - Facts, Significance & Rosa Parks - HISTORY
Montgomery Bus Boycott, protestors on the march. Source: history.com

The time period may be different, but the principle is the same; you treat us unethically, immoral and devoid of human rights then we take our business elsewhere where we are valued.

Thus highlighting the economic consequences of racial segregating the black community, as we are the largest consumers. If we poured into our own community, our cup would runneth over and create a recirculation of black wealth.

Blackness can thrive. Economics is the way forward

The Black community in the UK makes up 3% of the population which is seemingly minute. Yet according to the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising (IPA), the spending power of Black consumers is £300 billion.

In an article by Sonia Brown of National Black Women’s Network, Daniel Lister, Founder of My Black Market, wrote in 2011 that “the Black community spends 95% of its money outside of the community. Of the remaining 5% that is spent within the community, 3% goes to non-Black owned businesses, leaving us with only 2% of our income; and nobody can live off 2% of their income.” Government research in 2019 showed that almost a third of black people in England want to start their own business, only 4% manage to do so – a level lower than any other ethnic groups.

According to 2017 research by the Economic and Social Research Council, businesses run by Black and minority ethnic (BME) entrepreneurs contribute an estimated £25-£32 billion pounds per year to the British economy. These statistics remind us black wealth can be created, with careful organisation and support.

The economy gravely suffers when we do not pour into it. As active consumers, protests are great but they do not hold the same weight, vigour or strength as our spending power. Financial xenophobia must be understood and practised at the core of any pro-black movement. This will empower us to create the institutions needed to uplift the community, which is paramount to the removal of a police force that is not equipped culturally, physically or systematically to police our communities.

Change must be sustainable, and blackness is a living element of our lives that never change, but the way we approach racism can change. As a community, we are aware that many institutions are littered with structural inequality. Its time we boycotted those institutions and supported black businesses, to generate a solid objective from our protest.

Conversation not just legislation will save BAME organ donation

Every day in the UK, someone dies waiting for an organ transplant. To enable more people to save more lives, the law around organ donation has been changed. 

What is the opt-out system?

From May 20th, new legislation, Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act came into effect creating an ‘opt out’ system, following a number of other countries including Wales and Spain. This means that every adult living in England is automatically considered as an organ donor unless they have a recorded decision to not donate or are part of the excluded groups. 

A picture containing person, outdoor, man, watching

Description automatically generated
New organ donation laws. Source: NHS Blood and Transplant

It is commonly referred to as the ‘Max and Kierra Law’ in recognition of Kiera Ball, a nine-year-old whose organs was donated after a fatal car accident, saving 4 lives including that of nine-year-old Max Johnson whose heart was failing after infection. 

Why is the law around organ donation changing? 

The opt out system is in response to the national shortage of donors and the increasing demand of organ transplants. There are currently over 6,000 people on the UK Transplant Waiting List  and currently around 400 people die waiting each year. 

Transplant activity in the UK (2018-2019) // Source: NHS Blood and Transplant

It is hoped that the opt out system will lead to 700 more organ transplants by 2023 and start a national conversation around organ donation especially within Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities. 

Why is ethnicity important in the conversation on organ donations? 

In the UK, a higher proportion of people from BAME backgrounds develop high blood pressure, diabetes and certain forms of hepatitis, are more susceptible to organ failure and in need of a transplant at some point in their lives. Genetic matches between donor and recipient are key to transplant success, and people from the same ethnic group are more likely to be that match. 

BAME patients are overrepresented in the transplant list but only make up 6.5% of the organ donation register. For every black deceased donor , there were 31 black patients in need of an organ. 

The challenge in increasing the number of BAME donors often stems from cultural and religious beliefs; in a survey of 1000 BAME Londonors, 51% said they were unwilling to donate for religious reasons. A common assumption shared is that your organs are needed after death, and that you should go to your maker whole so donating organs would compromise that. Furthermore, it’s often reported that some communities lack trust in the government system and believe that the duty of care given by health professionals would be greatly reduced if they were on the organ donor register. 

To break down these myths and barriers, and to increase support for organ donation within BAME communities, NHS Blood and Transplant have partnered with community-based organisations such as Caribbean and African Health Network (CAHN), who work to empower and equip faith and community organisations to shape and deliver health services across Greater Manchester. CAHN leads the Precious Life Savers project aimed at increasing awareness, knowledge and support for organ donation. Rev Charles Kwaku-Odoi, Chief Officer of CAHN says “recruiting faith leaders as ambassadors for organ donation and improving diversity in organ donation nursing specialism will aid in overcoming myths and barriers in the black community”.

There are some exceptions to the rules for people under 18 and family and religious preferences will be taken into account. As the majority of the population welcomes the opt in system, this may mean a much wider pool of people on the register. However without tackling the distrust and lack of information within communities at its root, as well as within faith groups and teachings, this legislation may make the situation worse. Giving up bodily control, even to ‘save lives’ can be problematic, given the impropriety and historical inequality black and brown people had and continue to have with the state and health systems.

A recent campaign from NHS Blood and Transplant highlighting the taboos that exist in BAME communities // NHS Blood and Transplant

Words and deeds

Discussions in families, with children and in forums where people’s concerns are actively listened to are all still very necessary to empower people with facts. Only 42% of BAME families agreed to organ donation by a deceased relative, compared to 71% of white families in NHS Blood and Transplant statistics. Families are simply not having these conversations and BAME people feel it’s safer to say no in these moments of crisis. While the above recent campaign shows it is open conversations that matter, it’s not only within family groups. 2017 figures showed 47% of UK donations happened when the patient’s wishes were not known at the time of death. Training for doctors and intensive care staff to not only have informed and compassionate conversations with patients’ families but to listen, understand their loss and normalise the impact of donation, especially for those with possible religious or cultural misgivings. Transparency engenders trust.

Spain, a world-leader in donation rates has a refusal rate of just 18%. Dr Rafeal Matesans who leads their national transplants organisation, attributes their success to training 16,000 intensive care doctors in identifying potential donors and 200 coordinators specifically to spend more time with patients and families, generating “open discussions” between them and systems. Tailored work of faith and community organisations tackle access to information and taboos, but more must be done to mirror this approach within the wider health systems, to engage multicultural populations as active partners and supporters in their own care.
For more information and to register your decision visit: www.organdonation.nhs.uk

Adesewa Adebisi is a recent Biochemistry graduate from The University of Huddersfield with an upcoming Masters of Research in Oncology. She is also Sabbatical Officer for the University of Huddersfield.

American Politics: A Tale of Divide and Conquer

‘You’ve never had it so good’ was made popular by Harold Macmillan, who was British Prime Minister from 1957 to 1963. Less known, is this was actually a slogan lifted from the 1952 US election campaign. Back then it ran somewhat true. We had segregation avoiding clashes, political systems sought compromise rather than reinforce identity politics us against them. By the 1960s, America was in trouble. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were murdered. President Kennedy and Senator Kennedy were shot dead. Riots set cities ablaze. Domestic terrorism by the Klansmen against the Civil Rights Movement.

Peaceful protests by well dressed Civil Rights Activists were turned on by dogs and hoses. The Vietnam draft and the Democratic Party 1968 Convention erupting into violence. America was coming apart at the seams. Discord met with misery and bloodshed.

The 1960s political stability came at the moral cost of segregation. What the system could not solve, it suppressed. The compromises saved America but ended that political system. Nixon weaponised the suppressed resistance of Southern States’ white populations, who were against Civil Rights equality, running his campaign on states’ rights and “law and order”.

Era of protest, the Vietnam Draft // Source: alamy

The political realignment that followed forced the hand of Democrats to target the racially, religiously diverse, urban liberals. Republicans became white, wealthy suburban and rural Christian Conservatives. And so, politics became polarised. The political coalitions today mirror our particular social divisions. As time went on, rifts between parties sought to escalate tensions to mobilise support centred around our differences rather than commonalities.

Mourners paying their respect to Martin Luther King Jr after his assassination as leader of the Civil Rights Movement // Source: Black History Month Archives

Round the clock media coverage rounded a reformed identity politics. Media outlets are feedback loops, reflecting greater assuredness in our narrow thought chambers, amplifying our self-righteous group biases. This culminated in a tv star President, caught within a narrow feedback loop, running the country. President Trump plays off the discord, escalating our divisions where a leader should disperse them.

When the looting starts, the shooting starts

President Donald J. Trump 2020 (attributed to Walter Headley, 1967 Miami police chief)

We used to brush off his Twitter rants. But that was when we didn’t need a leader today that past eras took for granted. Incompetent response to the pandemic is ravaging the economy hidden by artificially inflated pay checks and a rising stock market. The rioting reflects the uncertainty we face, failings of government, and frustration against both lockdown measures and societal injustices. What previously couldn’t possibly happen to us is now right at our doorstep, not just via camera phones in every hand.

“When the looting starts, the shooting starts,” Trump tweeted, in a threatening communiqué Twitter saw fit to ban. This was actually quoted from the Miami police chief Walter Headley’s 1967 warning over race riots, and by George Wallace’s 1968 presidential campaign. No one accused Trump of being original.

We live in an era where our divisions define us, rather than our similarities. This is reflected in our political allegiances. Few Americans want violence, nor rioting on our streets. This incident is unlikely to turn the country against itself. But it wouldn’t take much more to send America into civil war. We are all worn out, frustrated and divided. 2020 is election year. America is crying out for leadership and it isn’t being found.

When will Police brutality against Black bodies stop?

The United States has been hit by six days of protests against police brutality, following the death of George Floyd at the hands of a police officer on 25th May 2020. 

George Floyd, a 46-year-old black man, died in police custody after a white officer handcuffed him and knelt on his neck for almost nine minutes as Floyd pleaded that he could not breathe. Floyd became motionless,  Chauvin continued to kneel on him, all while on video.

The police officer Derek Chauvin, has since been fired has been charged with third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. Chauvin had a previous 18 internal complaints, with two of the complaints “closed with discipline”, according to the police summary.

The other officer present in the social media video, Tou Thao, had six complaints filed against him according to internal affairs. Five were closed without complaint, and one remains open. In 2017, Mr Thao settled out of court in an excessive use of force case.

George Floyd Protests: How to Help, Where to Donate
Protestors with placards against the death of George Floyd. Source // thecut.com

Protests have continued across US cities, including Minneapolis, Denver, New York and Oakland. Sunday, May 31st protestors took to the street in London in solidarity.

“A riot is the language of the unheard”

Martin Luther King uttered the words “A riot is the language of the unheard” in 1967. More than 50 years later, the US government has failed to hear the cries of freedom. The black community has been a powder keg waiting to explode and another case of police brutality is what has set the match alight.

Donald Trump spoke out about the riots and Twitter deleted his post for violating the platform’s rules about glorifying violence.

Twitter hides Trump tweet for 'glorifying violence' - Reuters
Donald Trumps tweet threatening violence against protestors // Source: sky.com

Trump has since signed an executive order to regular social media companies, to prevent a “threat to free speech.” 

Former Boston Police chief Daniel Linskey said that a group “outside the U.S.” is using the ongoing protests over George Floyd‘s death to “destabilize our society.”

Former Boston Police Chief Daniel Linskey Source: kroll.com

He continued: “We have individuals who are hijacking legitimate outrage over systemic issues of race in our society…to engage in violence for their own purposes.”

If there are people using the riots as tools for their own selfish reasons they need to be rooted out. Yet the truth of these statements are unseen. Attributing any problems to outside radical agents is easier politically, brushing over the genuine issues at the core of events.

The riots are justifiable, as a way to be heard in a system of capitalism that relies on mass consumption. The problem lies in its all-consuming nature. Though to create change disobedience must be outside of norms, organised chaos must be engineered to carefully disturb the economics of America to protest against injustice. The black American spending power of over $1 trillion dollars means this represents major leverage.

Origins of the American Police Force

The preconceived idea of American police ranges from 1) A county sheriff managing debts between neighbours, 2) a constable on horseback serving an arrest warrant or 3) watchman carrying a lantern through his sleeping town ensuring peace is maintained.

These practices were adapted to the colonies from England, in turn, forming the foundation of American law enforcement at a time when black people were understood only as property, not individuals with free will.

CrimethInc. : Slave Patrols and Civil Servants : A History of ...
Slave patrol officers whipping and catching a slave // Source: crimethinc.com

The American South relied nearly entirely and exclusively on slave labour. White Southerners lived in near-constant fear of slave rebellions and their economic/social consequences. Their ‘slave patrols’ were designed to control the movements, discipline slaves and visibly enforce violent white supremacy against black men.

Can a system with unjust, immoral and unethical foundations also serve the betterment of the black community? The evidence previously and currently suggests not.

Police and the black community have a turbulent relationship and increased militarization, surveillance and continuing deaths at the hand of the police add fuel to the ever-increasing fire. The shouts of “I can’t breathe” are being heard over and over again.

The UK is not innocent

Often the UK believes itself to be better than America, Stephen Lawrence & Mark Duggan are staunch reminders of the issues in the UK, between black people and the police. The fatal shooting of Mark Duggan by Metropolitan police in 2011 in North London was explained due to him being in possession of a handgun. However, his 2014 inquest found he was not holding a weapon at all. His death sparked riots similar to that of George Floyd.

Killing that sparked London riots was lawful says UK jury
Mark Duggan // Source: thejournal.ie

A report by charity Inquest studying deaths in custody showed over 1,500 people have died in, or following, police custody in the UK since 1990. A different report from The Institute of Race Relations shows that 509 black and minority ethnic individuals died in prison, detention centres or after contact with police.

Inquests into these deaths in 2018-19 have highlighted delays and failures in the police recognising and responding promptly to medical emergencies. Substance abuse and mental ill-health are a prominent feature, further demonstrating a failure to implement adequate precautions from previous deaths.

System change 

Audre Lorde said “For the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. They may allow us temporarily to beat him at his own game, but they will never enable us to bring about genuine change.” Perhaps it is time we built our own house. 

As a people, we can not heal in the same environment that made us sick as institutions across America are permeated and built on white supremacy. The police rebuilding their relationship with the black community is only part of what is needed. To create an organisation that protects, serves and encourages black people to thrive needs dire systematic reform that reaches far beyond the police.

“Move on”: can we afford to?

“Move on” – is it easier for those in power to misdirect the public and hide from accountability?

Dominic Cummings, aide to prime minister Boris Johnson, recently broke lockdown rules by travelling 260 miles from his home in London to his family state in Durham. Not only did he drive to the estate, but he also drove to Barnard Castle to self “test” his eyesight after concluding that COVID-19 had possibly affected his eyesight – according to him, he chose a destination that was closer, rather than risk a longer drive immediately.

In a statement that was broadcast widely, Cummings said: “I believe that in all circumstances, I behaved legally and reasonably.”

However, Durham police have stated Cummings is likely to have broken lockdown rules, being responsible for what is considered a “minor breach.”

Despite coming under heavy fire from the media and the public, and facing calls for his resignation from quite a few Tory MPs, Boris Johnson has continued to defend Cummings, telling reporters at the daily press briefing on 28th May that he intended to “draw a line under the matter.” Johnson also refused to let scientific advisers speak, stating that he did not want them to be a part of a “political” row.

However, this situation cannot be simply brushed aside, twisted as an insignificant matter being sensationalised. It is a humane issue that goes far beyond who likes who in parliament and scoring political points. Millions of British citizens have been complying to lockdown restrictions since 23rd March 2020 – although some have not fully complied, the majority have. British people have done so for the sake of their health and the health of others – people have lost their loved ones without being able to say goodbye, and in some cases , they haven’t been able to attend funerals. There is no doubt that many will have remaining trauma as a result of this pandemic that will need to be addressed once we are in a place of safety as a country again.

Emily Maitlis BBC; Source: Byline Times

Newsnight presenter Emily Mantis highlighted a key fact in her introduction to the programme a few weeks ago, coronavirus is “not a great leveller – the consequences of which everyone, rich or poor, suffers the same. This is a myth that needs debunking.” Mantis herself has faced backlash from the BBC after breaking their impartiality rules with her recent comments. She said that Cummings “made those who struggled to keep the rules feel like fools. “

The fact that Cummings’ actions will reap no true consequences to his own detriment demonstrates a flaw in the message of binding together as a nation in the face of this pandemic. It highlights the very privilege of unconditional protection that the members of the establishment possess.

Protester outside Dominic Cummings’ London home; Source: Newsraiser

Not only did Cummings actions breach lockdown rules, but he was the one who warned about the dangers of pandemics and advised on those very same rules that he broke.

The political pyramid of MPs that defended his actions also shows that it’s hard to hold the powerful to account, although over one million people have tried to do so by signing a petition for him to resign. The Conservative party won with an astounding majority, so surely it is too much to ask for transparency?

Cummings resignation may not be the answer, especially as he stated that his actions were out of love for his family and an instinct to protect them. However, the whole reason as to why the government put rules and regulations in place, is to protect British citizens from a virus that doesn’t care about their instincts. Furthermore, the fact that politicians are able to break the rules without consequences sends a very clear message – that the moral standards are not the same.

This is not an issue of petty point-scoring – it is one of humanity, and we must address it as such.

Did you know Yoga had a huge Impact on mental health?

In light of the recent Coronavirus pandemic, mental health has been at the forefront of many discussions. Staying indoors and living in a continual state of anxiety has had a significant impact on individuals around the world who perhaps did not suffer from pre-existing mental health issues. Throughout this series, we will explore various methods that can be used to help manage mental health during these testing times and evaluate how they actually facilitate in relieving strains on the mind – starting with Yoga.

History

Yoga is derived from the Sanskrit word ‘yuji’ meaning union – representing how it combines the body and mind. It has been an effective form of therapy for over 5000 years and was developed by the Indus-Sarasvati civilisation in Northern India, who drew from the instructions proscribed in old sacred texts like the Rig Veda. The practice was refined and enhanced throughout the years by native mystic seers who further polished the ritual and further documented these additions in influential scriptures. Yoga in the present day is now a widely renowned and practised activity. It has undergone increasing gentrification and has been popularised throughout the world as a form of exercise as opposed to a spiritual release. The number of over 50s practising Yoga has tripled over the last four years whilst American’s on average spend $16billion on Yoga classes, clothing and equipment every year.

Benefits

As a tool to manage mental health, Yoga has distinct physiological effects that link to the subconscious. As reported by the American Psychological Association, Yoga has been shown to enhance social wellbeing through enhancing a sense of belonging and actualisation – two feelings that stimulate the limbic system in the brain and reduce symptoms of depression. It can further be used to improve conditions such as hyperactivity, attention deficit, sleeping disorders and even schizophrenia. It additionally increases levels of gamma-aminobutyric acid or GABA, a chemical that regulates nerve activity, facilitating people with anxiety disorders and those who suffer from sensory overloads. As well as mental health Yoga, has distinct benefits on physical health through reducing inflammation, chronic pain and heart health.

Overall, this ancient practice can be seen to have a distinct indirect impact on mental well-being and has been proven to concomitantly rejuvenate the mind and body.

A case of race: How racism can impact mental health

Racism is not short of its involvement in popular discussion. As debates of race and identity have increased tenfold, due mostly to the migrations of different ethnicities all around the world, so has the dilemma of tackling the ignorance, assimilation and the play of micro and macro-aggressions that follow diversity.  

As black people, in this new era of perceived racial awareness, we are constantly asked to discuss our experiences with racism and its pernicious impact on our experiences with the law, police, communities, education and even beauty standards. Just as significant however, we seldom discuss the ways in which racism can dangerously and directly impact our mental health.

How does racism manifest into mental health issues such as anxiety, stress and depression?

In this generation of technological innovation and social media, our screens are flooded with what’s happening in all other areas of the world.

“It’s a celly, that’s a tool”

This lyric from the song “This is America” by Donald Glover formally known as Childish Gambino, elicits the idea that we can use media as a tool for documenting and exposing racism. Records of racism on social media can However, a negative consequence of always being aware is that we have become hyper-aware and this can potentially desensitise us to these incidences.

The hunting and slaughter of Ahmaud Arbery in Februrary whilst he was out jogging and the murder of taxi driver Trevor Belle after being purposely infected with COVID-19, are the latest in some of thousands of the murders we have all bared witness to recently. These killings bear heavy not only on the heart, but also on the mind and so naturally impacts the collective mentality of black and minority ethnic communities.

Trevor Belle, British Taxi Driver who died after being spat at by a COVID-19 positive passenger who refused to pay the fare (Source: Metro)

With images and scenes like these in constant rotation, as well as day to day encounters with micro-aggressions, it is not difficult to understand how the fear of encountering such dangerous and violent racism can manifest into feeling of anxiety and depression.

Using the specifications generated by several academics including, Jessica R. Graham-LoPresti Ph.d Salem State Universtiy, Tahirah Abdullah Ph.D and Amber Calloway M.A Uni of Massachusetts and Lindsey M. West Ph.D Augusta University in their forum “The Link Between Experiences of Racism and Stress and Anxiety for Black Americans” we can further understand how racism can impact mental health.

Lack of Control and Avoidance.

Viewing and experiencing instances of racism can result in anxiety because it in itself is caused by worry of an uncertain outcome. Racially motivated attacks and experiences exist outside the victim’s locus of control. Therefore, past experiences or fear of a negative outcome can lead to the development of anxiety.

Scene from “This is America” award winning single by Donald Glover where a group dance amidst the chaos around them (Source: CNN)

This can lead to avoidance behaviour in two ways; via suppression of ones’ emotions and ignoring the stressors which really, is just burying traumas which wait to be re-triggered. The other is physical avoidance of the situation, which could manifest into anxiety or social anxiety leading to e.g., not wanting to leave the house to avoid a possible racial confrontation.

The lack of control can also lead to feelings of severe dejection i.e. depression as the individual detaches themselves from the world.

Internalisation.

The internalisation of racism, the idea that racist or derogatory societal ideas about oneself are in fact true, leads to poor self-esteem and so causes psychological distress. This distress could mutate into anxiety, negative self-image and even body dysmorphia, when considering colourism and featurism which are rooted in Eurocentric beauty standards. If an individual doesn’t value themselves, and in the case of race, knows they can’t change themselves, this will lead to stress and a discontent with oneself.

woman in distress (Source: eatingdisordersolutions)

What are some ways of tackling this issue?

Addressing this issue is not dissimilar to the advice given to anyone suffering from a mental health issue. Getting proper medical help such as counselling is always a great step, but not always an option for various reasons. And so these are three ways that might help with mental issues due to race (only);

Accept, Address and Acknowledge

Accepting and acknowledging the overwhelming feeling and engaging with the sometimes distressing emotions that come with it, is very important. That is not to say one should adopt a defeatist mentality, but not blaming yourself for the experiences you have is essential. Self acceptance is a healthy mechanism, instead of suppressing completely rational emotions. Repression is not an efficient coping strategy and facing emotions head on can lessen the intensity of anxiety.

You may feel sad, angry or anxious, and that’s completely okay.

Meditation

Meditation is not just an activity for hippies, Buddhists and the spiritually enlightened but is a technique used all over the world. Simple breathing and counting exercises are a form of meditation which help us to be present and calm the mind. Mindfulness concentrates on the now and so is an excellent way of calming stresses of hectic everyday life.

Meditation (Source: claudelleglasgow)

Discussion

You are not alone. Although we may be described as minorities in the western world, there are plenty of people who not only look like us but also face the same fears and feelings when experiencing racism directly and indirectly. Following and connecting with people who empower and inspire you, who encourage honest discussions can positively impact your own wellbeing. Make it a mission to discuss the ways in which racism affects your personal mentality, and that loss of life and livelihood is not the only consequence of racism.